Skip to main content

In Julius Caesar, how does too much ambition lead to disaster?

Ambition leads to disaster for Caesar, Cassius and Brutus because they all die as a result.

Julius Caesar was killed by a conspiracy of senators because they felt that he was too ambitious.  Caesar marched on Rome and defeated Pompey, the former Roman Consul.  Many senators felt that he had over-reached his authority.  They worried that he was setting himself up to be king, and wanted to stop him before he had so much power that he was unstoppable.


Brutus explains to the people in his funeral speech that Caesar died for his ambitions.



As Caesar loved me, I weep for him;
as he was fortunate, I rejoice at it; as he was
valiant, I honour him: but, as he was ambitious, I
slew him. There is tears for his love; joy for his
fortune; honour for his valour; and death for his
ambition.  (Act 3, Scene 2)



As far as Brutus is concerned, Caesar deserved death and they are heroes for killing him.  He wants the people to feel the same way.  Unfortunately for him, Mark Antony gives a speech after Brutus where he calls Brutus and the other conspirators killers.  He whips the crowd into a frenzy, and they drive the conspirators out of Rome.


Brutus and Cassius did not give up.  They attempted to defeat Mark Antony, now allied with Caesar’s heir Octavius (and Lepidus).  Raising an army with their own funds and promises of riches, they take on the triumvirate.  However, ambition again results in disaster.  Brutus and Cassius can’t agree on anything.  There is infighting within their ranks.  They end up committing suicide.  Cassius thinks he is defeated and kills himself, and Brutus kills himself when the battle is lost.


Despite the fact that he has been fighting Brutus, Antony gives an interesting speech in which he refers to him (not Cassius) as noble.



This was the noblest Roman of them all:
All the conspirators save only he
Did that they did in envy of great Caesar;
He only, in a general honest thought
And common good to all, made one of them. (Act 5, Scene 5)



Based on this, Antony (or Shakespeare) feels that Brutus was acting nobly.  This does not mean that he was not ambitious though.  You can be noble and still take on too much.  Brutus’s goal was to restore the Roman republic, but while that may have been a noble goal it was too ambitious and destroyed him.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more