Skip to main content

How does Shakespeare dramatize the idea of justice in The Merchant of Venice?

The theme of justice recurs throughout The Merchant of Venice. Shylock declares, “I stand for judgment.” He argues that he does no wrong. Just as the Christians in Venice own slaves, Shylock claims to own Antonio through the bond that they signed. Antonio agreed to give up a pound of flesh if he could not repay his debt to Shylock on time, which he cannot. Shylock argues for precise justice, pointing out the bond does not allow any doctors or reprieve.

Perhaps because Shylock is Jewish, Shakespeare writes Shylock as having an Old Testament eye-for-an-eye mentality. In Act III, Scene 1, Shylock points out the similarities between Christians and Jews in his argument as to why he should be able to exact vengeance on Antonio: “If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be by Christian example? Why, revenge.”


Portia describes the superiority of mercy, but ultimately succeeds in simultaneously fulfilling the law and saving Antonio. She points out the bond allows for exactly a pound of flesh: “Shed thou no blood, nor cut thou less nor more / But just a pound of flesh.” She refuses to let Shylock renege on the deal that he insisted on upholding: “as thou urgest justice, be assured / Thou shalt have justice, more than thou desirest.” Moreover, Shylock risks losing his estate and his life due to a conspiracy to murder a Christian.


Ostensibly, mercy wins. Antonio and the Duke forgive Shylock, “That thou shalt see the difference of our spirits,” suggesting that they hold to the New Testament’s ideal of loving one’s enemies. Portia says mercy is more powerful than any mortal form of control and that “in the course of justice, none of us / Should see salvation.”


Shylock loses half of his money, must give the other half to his daughter and her Christian husband, and is forced to convert to Christianity. The citizens of Venice see this as a blending of justice and mercy, but it shows the limits and hypocrisy of mercy. The law refuses to show mercy to Antonio and simply urges Shylock to be merciful. The state saves Antonio, but the slaves of Venice receive no such release. Also, the Christians and Jews are treated unequally in the name of mercy: Shylock is considered an alien; Antonio, a citizen. Antonio sees Christianity as a blessing, so Shylock’s forced conversion is merciful in Antonio’s eyes. On the other hand, we see Shylock stripped of his identity, an act that seems neither merciful nor just.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...