Skip to main content

Did Victor do the right thing in Chapter 20 of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein?

When, during Victor Frankenstein's very lengthy encounter with his creation, the "wretch," the monster proposes an arrangement whereby, if Victor will agree to create a female companion for him, he will disappear forever from Victor's life, the young scientist is forced to ponder the possible ramifications of this agreement. In Chapter 20 of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Victor does indeed proceed to consider the potential consequences of bringing into the world another creature the destructive nature of which could bring about more problems. Early in this chapter, Shelley depicts her protagonist as a tortured soul, struggling desperately for the right answer to the question of whether to abide the creature's proposition:


"I was now about to form another being of whose dispositions I was alike ignorant; she might become ten thousand times more malignant than her mate and delight, for its own sake, in murder and wretchedness. He had sworn to quit the neighbourhood of man and hide himself in deserts, but she had not . . ."



Readers of Frankenstein will recall that it took Victor but the briefest of moments to regret his efforts at reanimating dead tissue while away at university. Readers will also, however, recall Victor's determination to pervert nature with insufficient consideration of the consequences of those actions ahead of time. His pursuit of scientific discovery is so single-minded that he gives little thought to the practical implications of his actions. He does, in fact, question himself in this regard, but any reservations about tinkering with nature are subordinated to his quest for discovery. Now, with the creature's proposal in hand, Victor is equally determined to prevent himself from making the same mistake twice, and herein lies the question of his decision to deny the creature the female companion he had promised. The creature's reaction to Victor's decision to destroy the female companion on which he had already made substantial progress is described in the following passage from Chapter 20:



"The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness, and with a howl of devilish despair and revenge, withdrew."



The creature's reaction, of course, is to continue to murder everybody close to Victor, including his new bride, Elizabeth, and his closest friend, Henry Clerval. So, when considering whether Victor made the right decision when he tore apart the female creature on which he had labored for the benefit of the male creature to which he had given life, it is advisable to consider the immediate ramifications of that decision: the brutal murders of the two people left in his life to whom he was especially close.


The creature had promised that he would disappear from the company of man forever if Victor created a female companion for him. Victor initially relented, and then, in front of the creature, went back on his word, violently tearing apart the female. Assuming the creature was a "monster of honor," in effect, that he would enter into the arrangement with Victor with honorable intentions, and would depart for some remote location for the remainder of his days, then Victor could not have made a worse decision. Victor was correct that he could not foresee the possible implications of bringing into the world a second monster, but he knew beyond doubt that, failing to follow through on his end of the bargain, he guaranteed that the living creature would continue his reign of terror. Personally, I would have built the female creature. The entire point of the creature's exceptionally long monologue regarding his experiences with the blind man and his family was that he wanted nothing more than to live peaceably alongside normal beings. Only when rejected, as with Victor's initial reaction upon observing his creation, did the monster destroy. Complying with the terms of the agreement, then, would have been the safest approach to take.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is hyperbole in the story "The Gift of the Magi" by O. Henry?

The most obvious use of hyperbole in "The Gift of the Magi" occurs when the narrator describes Della's and Jim's evaluations of their two treasures—her long, luxuriant hair and his gold watch. Had the Queen of Sheba lived in the flat across the airshaft, Della would have let her hair hang out the window some day to dry just to depreciate Her Majesty's jewels and gifts. Had King Solomon been the janitor, with all his... The most obvious use of hyperbole in "The Gift of the Magi" occurs when the narrator describes Della's and Jim's evaluations of their two treasures—her long, luxuriant hair and his gold watch. Had the Queen of Sheba lived in the flat across the airshaft, Della would have let her hair hang out the window some day to dry just to depreciate Her Majesty's jewels and gifts. Had King Solomon been the janitor, with all his treasures piled up in the basement, Jim would have pulled out his watch every time he passed, just to see him plu

How can I analyze Moon and Six Pence by Somerset Maugham?

In "Moon and Sixpence," loosely based on the life of Paul Gaugin, Maugham presents a study of the tension between the "civilized" life of 19th century Europe, and the lead character's desire to throw off the shackles of bourgeois life. Charles Strickland is a middle-aged English stockbroker with a wife and family. By abandoning his domestic life, Strickland commits what many in European society would consider a gross betrayal of one of the foundations of... In "Moon and Sixpence," loosely based on the life of Paul Gaugin, Maugham presents a study of the tension between the "civilized" life of 19th century Europe, and the lead character's desire to throw off the shackles of bourgeois life. Charles Strickland is a middle-aged English stockbroker with a wife and family. By abandoning his domestic life, Strickland commits what many in European society would consider a gross betrayal of one of the foundations of that society. His decision to e

What are some literary devices in Macbeth, Act V, Scene 1?

Act V, Scene i of Macbeth certainly continues the imagery that is prevalent in the play with its phantasmagoric realm, as in this scene a succession of things are seen or imagined by Lady Macbeth. Imagery - The representation of sensory experience Lady Macbeth imagines that she sees bloody spots (visual imagery) on the stairs; she also smells blood (olfactory imagery): Here's the smell of the blood still. All the perfumes of Arabia will not... Act V, Scene i of Macbeth certainly continues the imagery that is prevalent in the play with its phantasmagoric realm, as in this scene a succession of things are seen or imagined by Lady Macbeth. Imagery - The representation of sensory experience Lady Macbeth imagines that she sees bloody spots (visual imagery) on the stairs; she also smells blood (olfactory imagery): Here's the smell of the blood still. All the perfumes of Arabia will not sweeten this little hand. Oh! oh, oh! (5.1.53-55) Hyperbole - Obvious exaggeration  There is also h