Skip to main content

Did Victor do the right thing in Chapter 20 of Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein?

When, during Victor Frankenstein's very lengthy encounter with his creation, the "wretch," the monster proposes an arrangement whereby, if Victor will agree to create a female companion for him, he will disappear forever from Victor's life, the young scientist is forced to ponder the possible ramifications of this agreement. In Chapter 20 of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein, Victor does indeed proceed to consider the potential consequences of bringing into the world another creature the destructive nature of which could bring about more problems. Early in this chapter, Shelley depicts her protagonist as a tortured soul, struggling desperately for the right answer to the question of whether to abide the creature's proposition:


"I was now about to form another being of whose dispositions I was alike ignorant; she might become ten thousand times more malignant than her mate and delight, for its own sake, in murder and wretchedness. He had sworn to quit the neighbourhood of man and hide himself in deserts, but she had not . . ."



Readers of Frankenstein will recall that it took Victor but the briefest of moments to regret his efforts at reanimating dead tissue while away at university. Readers will also, however, recall Victor's determination to pervert nature with insufficient consideration of the consequences of those actions ahead of time. His pursuit of scientific discovery is so single-minded that he gives little thought to the practical implications of his actions. He does, in fact, question himself in this regard, but any reservations about tinkering with nature are subordinated to his quest for discovery. Now, with the creature's proposal in hand, Victor is equally determined to prevent himself from making the same mistake twice, and herein lies the question of his decision to deny the creature the female companion he had promised. The creature's reaction to Victor's decision to destroy the female companion on which he had already made substantial progress is described in the following passage from Chapter 20:



"The wretch saw me destroy the creature on whose future existence he depended for happiness, and with a howl of devilish despair and revenge, withdrew."



The creature's reaction, of course, is to continue to murder everybody close to Victor, including his new bride, Elizabeth, and his closest friend, Henry Clerval. So, when considering whether Victor made the right decision when he tore apart the female creature on which he had labored for the benefit of the male creature to which he had given life, it is advisable to consider the immediate ramifications of that decision: the brutal murders of the two people left in his life to whom he was especially close.


The creature had promised that he would disappear from the company of man forever if Victor created a female companion for him. Victor initially relented, and then, in front of the creature, went back on his word, violently tearing apart the female. Assuming the creature was a "monster of honor," in effect, that he would enter into the arrangement with Victor with honorable intentions, and would depart for some remote location for the remainder of his days, then Victor could not have made a worse decision. Victor was correct that he could not foresee the possible implications of bringing into the world a second monster, but he knew beyond doubt that, failing to follow through on his end of the bargain, he guaranteed that the living creature would continue his reign of terror. Personally, I would have built the female creature. The entire point of the creature's exceptionally long monologue regarding his experiences with the blind man and his family was that he wanted nothing more than to live peaceably alongside normal beings. Only when rejected, as with Victor's initial reaction upon observing his creation, did the monster destroy. Complying with the terms of the agreement, then, would have been the safest approach to take.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

Discuss movements that were inspired by the Civil Rights Movement and list one success for each group.

African-Americans contributed in a very big way during World War II. These contributions were demonstrated at home and on the battlefield. After the war, African-Americans properly felt it was time for them to achieve equality with white Americans. During the 1950's, the modern Civil Rights Movement was born and it had a number of successes (integration of the military and Brown vs. Board of Education as examples.) This success inspired other activists to demand change... African-Americans contributed in a very big way during World War II. These contributions were demonstrated at home and on the battlefield. After the war, African-Americans properly felt it was time for them to achieve equality with white Americans. During the 1950's, the modern Civil Rights Movement was born and it had a number of successes (integration of the military and Brown vs. Board of Education as examples.) This success inspired other activists to demand change for their agendas. Two examples of moveme...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some tensions between men and women in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar?

Julius Caesar is a largely male-driven play. Calpurnia and Portia are the two main female characters, and they are both wives of major characters. Calpurnia is Julius Caesar’s wife. She makes public appearances with him, but there may be some awkwardness between them because of her inability to have children. He publicly tells Antony to touch Calpurnia to cure her of barrenness when he runs the Lupercal, a “holy race” and fertility festival. Calpurnia has... Julius Caesar is a largely male-driven play. Calpurnia and Portia are the two main female characters, and they are both wives of major characters. Calpurnia is Julius Caesar’s wife. She makes public appearances with him, but there may be some awkwardness between them because of her inability to have children. He publicly tells Antony to touch Calpurnia to cure her of barrenness when he runs the Lupercal, a “holy race” and fertility festival. Calpurnia has nightmares about Caesar’s death. She claims that she is not naturally super...
Post a Comment
Read more