Skip to main content

What were the significant contributions of Spivak and Bhabha to their schools of literary criticism? Also, what contributions to criticism have...

Gayatri Spivak has been an influential figure in rethinking Marxism, postmodernism, and feminism in the context of post-colonial, transnational capitalism. Her most often cited texts are the essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” and her book A Critique of Postcolonial Reason.Spivak’s notion of the “subaltern,” an underclass that exists independent of Marx’s proletariat, is an attempt to theorize classes of people, particularly women, who have been “erased” by the dominant culture and rendered unable to...

Gayatri Spivak has been an influential figure in rethinking Marxism, postmodernism, and feminism in the context of post-colonial, transnational capitalism. Her most often cited texts are the essay “Can the Subaltern Speak?” and her book A Critique of Postcolonial Reason. Spivak’s notion of the “subaltern,” an underclass that exists independent of Marx’s proletariat, is an attempt to theorize classes of people, particularly women, who have been “erased” by the dominant culture and rendered unable to “speak,” or be heard in public discourse.


Homi Bhabha is best known for his books Nation and Narration and The Location of Culture. Bhabha argues that traditional European notions of nationhood (that a nation can be defined by a single, coherent historical narrative) cannot apply to post colonial nations, and that instead national identity is “imagined” or produced through the interaction and conflict of many different cultural experiences. In fact, colonial rule itself produces the conditions for resistance through “mimicry” – the idea that by trying to instill European language and values on native populations, colonial rulers actually invite indigenous co-optation and inversion of official language.


Trauma theory seeks to understand the significance of past catastrophes or traumas. It is based on a few basic principles: first, that the trauma did happen; second, that the totality of the trauma is inaccessible to representation; third, that testimony about the trauma is a legitimate way to understand the importance of the trauma; fourth, the collective narrative created by testimony about the trauma can, through its incompleteness, provide “spaces” in which the significance of the trauma can be understood. Trauma theory provides a theoretical framework within which personal experience can be used to understand or construct the “reality” of historical trauma.


Taken together, Spivak and Bhabha, along with the trauma theorists, can be understood to be engaged in the same project: understanding and articulating the colonial experience – finding a way, either through Bhabha’s notion of “mimicry” or the “testimony” of trauma victims, to allow Spivak’s subaltern to finally speak.


Sources:


Berger, James. “Trauma and Literary Theory”. Contemporary Literature 38.3 (1997): 569–582. Web.


Simon, Jon, ed. From Agamben to Zizek: Contemporary Critical Theorists. Edinburgh: Univ. of Edinburgh Press. 2010. Print.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more