Skip to main content

Please explain some parallelism relating to Myrtle Wilson in The Great Gatsby.

First, Myrtle Wilson and her husband, George Wilson, are both just trying to get ahead in a world that really doesn't allow people who come from little to end up with a lot.  George badly desires to buy Tom Buchanan's older car from him so that he can sell it for a profit, but Tom just keeps stringing him along.  Myrtle badly desires to supplant Tom's wife, Daisy, but Tom keeps stringing her along knowing...

First, Myrtle Wilson and her husband, George Wilson, are both just trying to get ahead in a world that really doesn't allow people who come from little to end up with a lot.  George badly desires to buy Tom Buchanan's older car from him so that he can sell it for a profit, but Tom just keeps stringing him along.  Myrtle badly desires to supplant Tom's wife, Daisy, but Tom keeps stringing her along knowing that he'll never give her what she wants.  In his interactions with George, Tom can feel superior and in control.  In his interactions with Myrtle, he clearly also feels the same (he strikes her in the face when she disobeys him).  He uses them both to make himself feel good, and in this way, Myrtle's story runs parallel to her husband's.


Second, Myrtle Wilson seems to be trying to use Tom as well in her attempt to reach the American Dream.  She doesn't want to work for her prosperity as her husband does; she wants her rich lover to buy her pretty things and keep her in a nice apartment with beautiful clothes.  Love doesn't really seem to be a major factor for her in their relationship.  It's the same with Tom's wife, Daisy.  At this point, she really doesn't love him anymore; she loves Gatsby.  But once she finds out how Gatsby, the man she does love, has acquired his fortune -- illegally -- she returns, without hesitation, to her husband: the man with "old money" who can provide her with the kind of life she desires (just the same reason that Myrtle turns to Tom as well).

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more