Skip to main content

In a recent speech, European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi indicated that the central bank is concerned that the appreciating currency...

The direct action the central bank can take is to purchase foreign money (perhaps dollars or pounds) using newly-created Euros. This will effectively increase the demand for foreign currency, raising the price of foreign currency relative to Euros, meaning that the Euro will depreciate. This is the direct intervention effect.

Now, provided that the central bank doesn't sterilize the intervention by selling bonds to pull currency out of the local market---which it would be a bad idea to do, sterilized currency intervention generally doesn't work---this will increase the money supply of Euros (as some of those Euros will come back to buy European products), raising prices in Euros and then causing further depreciation, the indirect intervention effect.

These two effects are sketched in the first part of the diagram I've attached.

Then we go to the aggregate supply/aggregate demand graph to see what happens within the European economy. The direct intervention does nothing to the local aggregate demand (because all those extra Euros were spent on foreign currency), so there is no point in making a separate line on the graph. The indirect intervention does have an effect however; it raises prices, pulling aggregate demand upward. Prices will rise, output will rise, and with any luck, the rise in output will come with a fall in unemployment. This is shown on the second part of the attached image.

Depending on where we are on the aggregate supply curve, the amount of inflation needed to reduce unemployment will vary. If we are very low on the curve, a small amount of inflation will reduce unemployment dramatically; if we are very high on the curve, it would take a large amount of inflation to have any effect on unemployment. Europe's unemployment is high enough right now that they could probably see a fairly significant reduction in unemployment with a small amount of inflation.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more