Skip to main content

What were the research goals and ethical issues with the Milgrim Obedience study?

The primary goal of the Milgram Experiment was to determine the level of conflict between obedience to authority and matters of conscience. Milgram questioned the motivations of the accused in the Nuremberg trials, most of whom claimed that they acted against their own consciences in order to obey authority. The Milgram experiments began one year after the trial of an infamous Nazi soldier who cited similar justification for his actions.


Milgram sought to determine whether...

The primary goal of the Milgram Experiment was to determine the level of conflict between obedience to authority and matters of conscience. Milgram questioned the motivations of the accused in the Nuremberg trials, most of whom claimed that they acted against their own consciences in order to obey authority. The Milgram experiments began one year after the trial of an infamous Nazi soldier who cited similar justification for his actions.


Milgram sought to determine whether German soldiers in World War II were more obedient to authority than the average American would be under similar circumstances. To determine this, he selected male college participants at Yale University.


The chief ethical issue with the series of experiments conducted by Milgram and his colleagues was that the "teachers," or participants who had been given the role of authority figures in the study, believed they were causing real harm to the "learners," who were really Milgram's confederates. Although the learners were not actually harmed, the experiments were set up so the teachers believed they were delivering increasingly painful electrical shocks to the learners.


Critics have argued that Milgram's attempts to understand how far people would go to obey instruction even if it meant harming another person were ethically irresponsible. The conclusion of the study showed that most people would be willing to cause harm to another person if it meant obeying authority. Other ethical issues include the use of deception, exposing participants to stressful situations that may have caused psychological harm, and a study setup that did not make the right to withdraw obvious. One of the hallmarks of an ethical study is that participants are free to withdraw at any point, but the Milgram Experiment relied upon participants feeling pressured to remain in the study. Nonetheless, Milgram argued that his experiment was ethical and the option to withdraw was present because 35 percent of his participants chose to leave.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more