Skip to main content

Was it right to look at the subject from the perspective of a young, naïve boy in John Boyne's novel The Boy in Striped Pajamas?

Whether or not it was "right" to tell this story with a young boy as the focus is really a matter of opinion, so I cannot answer that question for you. However, I do think that The Boy in the Striped Pajamas("Pyjamas" in the UK) makes an important point and does it very well. So much of history seems to belong solely to adults. Children are often left out of historical documents and accounts,...

Whether or not it was "right" to tell this story with a young boy as the focus is really a matter of opinion, so I cannot answer that question for you. However, I do think that The Boy in the Striped Pajamas ("Pyjamas" in the UK) makes an important point and does it very well. So much of history seems to belong solely to adults. Children are often left out of historical documents and accounts, and so are often left out of historical fiction as well. The truth is that there were children involved in the Holocaust, and entire families were shaken up by the events on all sides. 


The protagonist, Bruno, is a powerful character because he is rather oblivious (as most children are) to what his parents do and what the strange place beyond his fence really is. He has just moved to a new home and naturally is in want of friendship, so when he meets Shmuel, he makes good effort to befriend him. Shmuel and Bruno are mirrors of each other, sharing the same birthday, but they live very different lives on their respective sides of the fence. This character dynamic shows a stark contrast between the lives of those who benefited under the Nazi regime and those who were punished. It is all the more powerful for telling a story about those who are often left out of our discussions of history-- children.


Bruno and Shmuel have all of the curiosity, love, and confusion childhood offers. Their story is one of the commonplace but undiscussed circumstances such trusting and adventurous children were forced into during the time of the Holocaust.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more