Skip to main content

What do you think would happen if the climax of Charlotte Bronte's Jane Eyre changed?

I think most readers would agree that the dramatic climax of Jane Eyreoccurs just before the most frequently quoted line from this novel; that is to say, "Reader, I married him." The scene just prior to this finds Jane going back to Thornfield to see Rochester, and discovering that he has been injured and blinded in a fire that was set by his wife Bertha. Since his wife has died, Rochester is now free...

I think most readers would agree that the dramatic climax of Jane Eyre occurs just before the most frequently quoted line from this novel; that is to say, "Reader, I married him." The scene just prior to this finds Jane going back to Thornfield to see Rochester, and discovering that he has been injured and blinded in a fire that was set by his wife Bertha. Since his wife has died, Rochester is now free to marry Jane, without worrying about social stigma. But it is here that Jane makes a crucial choice. She could decide not to marry Rochester, who is much older than she, and now also physically disabled. After fleeing Thornfield, becoming lost on the moors, and being taken in by strangers, Jane regains her focus and confidence and realizes that, regardless of whether it is right or wrong, she loves Rochester and must see him again. When she hears about the fire, her sympathy is aroused. It is tempting to think that Jane's decision to marry Rochester is one born of pity. But this crucial scene shows that the two are very much equals; intellectually and emotionally, if no longer physically. 


It's hard to imagine a different ending to this novel. However, it seems plausible that another possible outcome might have been that Jane would decide not to marry Rochester, but to remain his friend. Her deep loyalty to the few people in her life who have been kind to her helps justify the decision she ended up making. But Jane's independence is her most significant quality, and remaining unmarried would also have been a plausible outcome. And yet, her depth of passion and feeling are also strongly featured in this story, and it seems right for her to marry the man she loves in the end.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more