Skip to main content

In The Merchant of Venice, what is the importance of the trial scene and the role played by Portia in the scene?

Antonio’s trial is the climax of the play: having entered into a usury agreement with Shylock on behalf of Bassanio, which he was unable to repay, Antonio has been imprisoned. By the terms of the bond, Shylock can claim a pound of Antonio’s flesh upon forfeiture. Shylock intends to claim his heart, thereby killing Antonio.

 


Portia and her serving woman, Nerissa, disguise themselves as men to intervene in the trial. Portia becomes Balthasar, a doctor of law, and argues that Shylock ought to have mercy for Antonio. Her famous speech begins,



The quality of mercy is not strain'd,


It droppeth, as the gentle rain from heaven


Upon the place beneath: it is twice bless'd



She goes on to extol the virtues of mercy: that it displays power better than a crown ever could, that is is “an attribute to God himself,” that salvation cannot come from justice but only from mercy. In doing so, of course, she extols Christian values, which alienates Shylock as a Jew. However, she rules in favor of Shylock: the bond is forfeit, and therefore Shylock might claim his pound of flesh.



Why, this bond is forfeit;


And lawfully by this the Jew may claim


A pound of flesh, to be by him cut off


Nearest the merchant's heart.—Be merciful;


Take thrice thy money; bid me tear the bond.



But while she concedes that Shylock is owed his pound of flesh, by the terms of the bond no blood has been allotted with it. Therefore, Shylock cannot carve out his pound of flesh. Adding insult to injury, she rules that:



If it be proved against an alien


That by direct or indirect attempts


He seek the life of any citizen,


The party 'gainst the which he doth contrive,


Shall seize one half his goods; the other half


Comes to the privy coffer of the state;


And the offender's life lies in the mercy


Of the duke only, 'gainst all other voice.



Thus, Shylock has fallen: from possessing the power to legally take his enemy’s life to having his fortune confiscated and half given to that same enemy. Portia denies Shylock the same mercy that she had urged him to act upon, hypocritically; insult is added to injury when Antonio allows Shylock to keep half his fortune if he names Lorenzo as his heir and converts to Christianity. Shylock is humiliated and degraded, claiming that:



You take my house when you do take the prop


That doth sustain my house; you take my life,


When you do take the means whereby I live.



The trial scene serves many purposes: one of the main storylines comes to fruition as Shylock receives his downfall; Portia proves herself as capable as any man; and Antonio is relieved of the bond. Portia’s role is pivotal in this scene: without her intervention, Antonio would have died. In saving Antonio, Portia's character is fleshed out: she has gone from a woman trapped by her father's will to a woman more capable than any man present in the courtroom. At the same time, she is revealed to be hypocritical in her attitudes toward Shylock: she urges him to be merciful yet is unmerciful herself.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can you analyze the poem "Absolution" by Siegfried Sassoon?

Sure! Siegfried Sassoon fought in World War I and was wounded in battle; he spent much of his life speaking out against war, and these pacifist feelings are easy to see in his poems. This one, "Absolution," was published in 1917, the same year that Sassoon was hospitalized for what we know today as post-traumatic stress disorder. "Absolution" is a short poem that contains three stanzas of four lines each. The word "absolution" means "forgiveness," and... Sure! Siegfried Sassoon fought in World War I and was wounded in battle; he spent much of his life speaking out against war, and these pacifist feelings are easy to see in his poems. This one, "Absolution," was published in 1917, the same year that Sassoon was hospitalized for what we know today as post-traumatic stress disorder. "Absolution" is a short poem that contains three stanzas of four lines each. The word "absolution" means "forgiveness," and the v...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...