Skip to main content

What did Balthazar and Abram do during the fight in Act 1, Scene 1?

Abraham and Balthasar start a fight with Sampson and Gregory as part of the Montague-Capulet Feud.

Sampson and Gregory represent the House of Capulet, and Abraham and Balthasar represent the House of Montague.  The two families are in a feud that affects everyone even remotely related to them.  For this reason, apparently you can’t even walk on the street in Verona without a brawl starting.


Abraham and Balthasar’s brawl starts pretty innocently.   They are walking along in the street (with swords, of course), when Sampson insults them.  He does so slyly and silently, with what would be the equivalent of the modern middle finger.  Abraham calls him out on it.



Enter ABRAHAM and BALTHASAR


ABRAHAM


Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?


SAMPSON


I do bite my thumb, sir.


ABRAHAM


Do you bite your thumb at us, sir?


SAMPSON


[Aside to GREGORY] Is the law of our side, if I say
ay?


GREGORY


No. (Act 1, Scene 1) 



Balthasar doesn’t say anything, but he seems to engage in the fight.  Benvolio, another Montague, comes and tries to break it up.  Then Tybalt, another Capulet, comes and joins the fight.  Soon there is an all-out brawl in the streets where anyone who sides with either family joins in.



Enter, several of both houses, who join the fray; then enter Citizens, with clubs


First Citizen


Clubs, bills, and partisans! strike! beat them down!
Down with the Capulets! down with the Montagues! No. (Act 1, Scene 1) 



The heads of the two houses arrive, and then the prince.  He declares that there has been too much fighting, and lectures the Montagues and Capulets.  He also dictates the punishment of death to anyone who fights from then on. 


This scene indicates from the beginning how serious the feud is.  Everyone walks around with swords, and they are ready to use them at a moment’s notice for the smallest insult.  In addition, there is the penalty now for fighting. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more