Skip to main content

Why would Shakespeare put such contrasting themes about marriage/love and hate in one play? What is the effect in Romeo and Juliet?

Love and hate are antipodal--direct opposites--yet they both signify passionate emotions toward something or someone. Some say that one cannot hate without love. Romeo and Juliet is filled with both of these passions and shows how one can cancel out the other. Romeo and Juliet’s love is drowned by hate and leads to their deaths, but, after death, their love for one another quenches the hate between their families.


Something else central to the play...

Love and hate are antipodal--direct opposites--yet they both signify passionate emotions toward something or someone. Some say that one cannot hate without love. Romeo and Juliet is filled with both of these passions and shows how one can cancel out the other. Romeo and Juliet’s love is drowned by hate and leads to their deaths, but, after death, their love for one another quenches the hate between their families.


Something else central to the play is sexual attraction. In Shakespearean English, the word “die” could mean both to climax sexually and to lose one’s life. This comparison between the fires of love and death shows the extremity in which the characters of Romeo and Juliet live. They are surrounded by murder and violence, but the young lovers also discover the equally explosive force of love. Friar Lawrence describes the connection between ardor and violence:



These violent delights have violent ends
And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,
Which as they kiss consume...



This contrast between affection and spite is what makes Romeo and Juliet such a powerful, intense story, one that is relatable in countless contexts and cultures.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more