Skip to main content

Why would Shakespeare put such contrasting themes about marriage/love and hate in one play? What is the effect in Romeo and Juliet?

Love and hate are antipodal--direct opposites--yet they both signify passionate emotions toward something or someone. Some say that one cannot hate without love. Romeo and Juliet is filled with both of these passions and shows how one can cancel out the other. Romeo and Juliet’s love is drowned by hate and leads to their deaths, but, after death, their love for one another quenches the hate between their families.


Something else central to the play...

Love and hate are antipodal--direct opposites--yet they both signify passionate emotions toward something or someone. Some say that one cannot hate without love. Romeo and Juliet is filled with both of these passions and shows how one can cancel out the other. Romeo and Juliet’s love is drowned by hate and leads to their deaths, but, after death, their love for one another quenches the hate between their families.


Something else central to the play is sexual attraction. In Shakespearean English, the word “die” could mean both to climax sexually and to lose one’s life. This comparison between the fires of love and death shows the extremity in which the characters of Romeo and Juliet live. They are surrounded by murder and violence, but the young lovers also discover the equally explosive force of love. Friar Lawrence describes the connection between ardor and violence:



These violent delights have violent ends
And in their triumph die, like fire and powder,
Which as they kiss consume...



This contrast between affection and spite is what makes Romeo and Juliet such a powerful, intense story, one that is relatable in countless contexts and cultures.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more