Skip to main content

in A Tale of Two Cities, what support can be given for the idea that revenge and justice conflict depending on what a person deems justifiable?

Perhaps the best example to support the question of individual interpretations of revenge and justice is in the relationship of Madame Therese Defarge and her husband, Ernest Defarge.


In Chapter XII of Book the Third, Sydney Carton has entered the wine shop in St. Antoine, and Madame Defarge recognizes him as a Evremonde (remember that Charles Darnay and he look alike). Her husband concurs that there is a resemblance, but he feels that in her...

Perhaps the best example to support the question of individual interpretations of revenge and justice is in the relationship of Madame Therese Defarge and her husband, Ernest Defarge.


In Chapter XII of Book the Third, Sydney Carton has entered the wine shop in St. Antoine, and Madame Defarge recognizes him as a Evremonde (remember that Charles Darnay and he look alike). Her husband concurs that there is a resemblance, but he feels that in her vengeance against the uncles Evremonde, the brothers who are responsible for the death of Therese Defarge's brother and sister, "one should stop somewhere." Brutally, she replies, "At extermination."


Monsieur Defarge does not agree that exterminating the entire family is just, pointing out that the wife of the one Marquis, the mother of Charles, sought to make amends and the good Dr. Manette, father of Lucie, the wife of Charles, has suffered terribly in the past and just recently. Mme. Defarge argues that Manette is not a true friend of the Republic. Furthermore, she informs her husband that she has had "this race," the family of Evremonde, in her register for a long time, doomed to destruction and extermination. She further explains her justification for avenging the death of her brother, her sister, and the unborn child, all of whom died at the hands of the Evremondes:



"...those dead are my dead, and that summons to answer for those things descends to me!"



Yet Defarge thinks she should not carry her revenge to the point of extermination of Darnay's family. Therese Defarge insists that she is justified, saying to her husband,



"Then tell Wind and Fire where to stop...but don't tell me."



M. Defarge appeals again to his wife to spare Darnay and his wife, who he feels are innocent, but she insists again, "Tell the Wind and the Fire where to stop; not me!"

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...