Skip to main content

In the very beginning, the author states that there was no clear line between fishing and religion. What does this mean? Does this mean that...

I suppose that you could interpret the quote in a way that shows fishing and religion are equal in status.  I don't think it is necessary to think that way though.  I believe that the quote isn't meant to have the reader think the two are equal.  I think the quote is meant to highlight their similarities.  


The narrator explains that both religion and fly fishing are life long endeavors.  Neither is ever...

I suppose that you could interpret the quote in a way that shows fishing and religion are equal in status.  I don't think it is necessary to think that way though.  I believe that the quote isn't meant to have the reader think the two are equal.  I think the quote is meant to highlight their similarities.  


The narrator explains that both religion and fly fishing are life long endeavors.  Neither is ever totally mastered, but both are practiced daily, weekly, monthly, etc.  To be a devout religious person, it involves study, emotional desire, and practice.  Metaphorically, it involves the head, heart, and hands.  Fly fishing is like that.  It's not enough to know the motions.  You have to practice the motions.  It's not enough to like fishing, you have to study and practice it to get better at it.  


I like the end of the quote in question as well. It explains that the narrator's father learned the craft of fishing and taught it to others. He's also the minister who obviously teaches others about his religion. His religion is Christianity, which is full of fish references. Christ himself told his disciples (several of them were fishermen) that he would make them "fishers of men." To the main characters in the novel, fishing and religion are so closely intertwined that it is impossible to separate one from the other.  


Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more