Skip to main content

When is militarism used in the book Things Fall Apart?

Militarism crops up often in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart. Achebe uses scenes that depict the desire for military action throughout the novel to reinforce Okonkwo's bellicose nature. Indeed, early in the novel, Okonkwo first believes that the promise of war is the reason why all the important men in the village are called for a meeting:


“Okonkwo on his bamboo bed tried to figure out the nature of the emergency-- war with a...

Militarism crops up often in Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart. Achebe uses scenes that depict the desire for military action throughout the novel to reinforce Okonkwo's bellicose nature. Indeed, early in the novel, Okonkwo first believes that the promise of war is the reason why all the important men in the village are called for a meeting:



“Okonkwo on his bamboo bed tried to figure out the nature of the emergency-- war with a neighboring clan? That seemed the most likely reason, and he was not afraid of war. He was a man of action, a man of war” (10).



Okonkwo hopes for the opportunity to be violent and prove his abilities as a warrior.


However, it should be noted that militarism in not only used to describe and reinforce Okonkwo's brutal masculinity, but is also used when white settlers begin to become pervasive forces in Umuofia. When Okonkwo returns from exile, he questions why his tribe does not simply overthrow the white settlers and run then from town. His best friend Obierika informs him of the violence these settlers are capable of:



“'Perhaps I have been away too long.... But I cannot understand these things you tell me. What is it that has happened to our people? Why have they lost the power to fight?


'Have you not heard how the white man wiped out Abame?'” (175).



Thus, militarism is used throughout the novel to show the violence and upheaval of both Okonkwo's life and Umuofia as a whole.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...