Skip to main content

How does Reginald Rose's play Twelve Angry Men deepen our understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. jury system as a tool to...

Reginald Rose's script for Twelve Angry Men strengthens our understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. jury system by illuminating the flaws in human nature that can lead to a miscarriage of justice while also offering hope for the emergence of jurors of principle who will summon the moral courage necessary to go against a majority seeking to decide in a different direction the fate of the accused. 

Rose's script was well-written, depicting the efforts of twelve individuals tasked with determining the guilt or innocence of a young Hispanic man on trial for murdering his own father. It is instructive that Rose was inspired to write his script by his own experiences as a juror in a criminal trial. As he was quoted as saying from a 1997 interview with regard to his participation on a jury:



''It knocked me out. I was overwhelmed. I was on a jury for a manslaughter case, and we got into this terrific, furious, eight-hour argument in the jury room. I was writing one-hour dramas for 'Studio One' then and I thought, wow, what a setting for a drama.''



While Rose insisted that his script for Twelve Angry Men was entirely fictitious, it almost certainly reflects some of the biases and human dynamics he observed during his duty as a juror. Whether the racial and socioeconomic factors at play in his fictitious jury room mirrored any similar phenomena in the real-life jury on which he served, however, we will likely never know, Rose having passed away in 2002.


Rose's script is particularly useful in terms of studying the U.S. jury system for the dangers it depicts of allowing unchallenged prejudices to prevail. Juror 8 in Twelve Angry Men is the model of informed rational thought who succeeds in convincing the other 11 jurors to change their votes and to acquit the defendant. In order to do so, he must confront those prejudices, especially the biases advanced by Jurors 3 and 10, the first an angry, hostile man whose bitterness is ultimately ascribed to his own dysfunctional relationship with his son and the latter a simple-minded racist whose bias against the Hispanic defendant has entirely skewed his judgement. If there is a flaw to Rose's "jury," it might be Juror 8, the wise, level-headed nonconformist. At the beginning of his script, Rose provides detailed descriptions for each of the 12 jurors, and the description for Juror 8 says it all:



"A quiet, thoughtful, gentle man. A man who sees all sides of every question and constantly seeks the truth. A man of strength tempered with compassion. Above all, a man who wants justice to be done and will fight to see that it is."



Contrast this with his description for Juror 3, the angry, resentful one whose demeanor intimidates the weaker jurors:



"A very strong, very forceful, extremely opinionated man within whom can be detected a streak of sadism. A humorless man who is intolerant of opinions other than his own and accustomed to forcing his wishes and views upon others."



Now, let's look at Rose's description for Juror 5:



"A naïve, very frightened young man who takes his obligations in this case very seriously, but who finds it difficult to speak up when his elders have the floor."



Contrasting a strong, forceful, extremely opinionated juror with a "naive, very frightened young man . . . who finds it difficult to speak up when his elders have the floor" provides Rose's script a very useful mechanism for depicting the actual dynamics that can occur in any gathering, including a jury. A potential weakness in the real-life jury system is the risk of weak-minded jurors being adversely influenced by stronger-willed ones. As Twelve Angry Men progresses, the ability of Juror 3 to intimidate the others begins to disappear. The human dynamics that could have ended in a miscarriage of justice were eventually overtaken by the increasing willingness of other jurors to either come around to Juror 8's perspective on the concept of reasonable doubt, or to switch their decision to "innocent" for the primary purpose of ending the proceedings so that they can move on to other things (recall, for example,  Juror 7's admonition at the beginning of the jury deliberations that "This better be fast. I’ve got tickets to The Seven Year Itch tonight"). [Note: The Seven Year Itch was an actual play, later adapted for film, that was very popular at the time]


Twelve Angry Men depicts both the strengths and weaknesses of the U.S. jury system in its depiction of the myriad personalities, temperaments, and levels of education that are represented in real-life scenarios. The deliberative process at the heart of the play represents the strengths; the prejudices and misguided priorities that are reflected in some of the jurors represent the weaknesses.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...