Skip to main content

In the book Saturday Night and Sunday Morning by Alan Sillitoe, is Arthur an idealist or a materialist?

Arthur is an injured idealist who hides his disappointment in materialism and sensualism. When he is passing the factory where he works, he thinks to himself,


"With the wages...you could go on a ten-day binge and get rid of all you'd saved. Because it was no use saving your money year after year. A mug's game, since the value of it got less and less and you never knew when the Yanks were going to do something daft like dropping the H-bomb on Moscow" (page 23).



He is not a materialist because he does not save the wages he earns or spend them on anything other than getting drunk and being with Brenda and Winnie, two sisters, both married, with whom he is having adulterous and disastrous affairs. His idealism is tarnished by a deep sense of nihilism, or believing in nothing, which he reveals in the quote above. His crushed sense of idealism comes from living in a world in which destruction from the H-bomb can be immediate and in which his work in the factory is soul-crushing. Nonetheless, a sense of idealism lives within him. 


His life is literally divided between Saturday night, when he carouses and has illicit affairs, and Sunday morning, when he deals with the aftermath of his carousing. After the husband of one of the women he is cheating with beats him up, he eventually has a conversion to a more idealistic and committed life. He realizes that he should commit himself to Doreen, a nineteen-year-old who refuses to become involved with him unless he is serious. “He should have kept to the safe and rosy path with Doreen" (page 166), he thinks. In the end, he has an idealistic notion of his commitment to Doreen and promises to take care of her, showing that he is ultimately idealistic if he has something or someone to commit himself to. 

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more