Skip to main content

How do you approach an essay question that uses "To what extent do you agree" as its stem?

In my experience, teachers never assign a question like this if the answer is anything other than “to some extent.” In other words, whatever the proposition after the stem is, it is always partly true and partly untrue. So, if there is a question that asks “to what extent was the US responsible for the Allied victory in WWII in Europe,” I assume that the instructor believes that the US was partly responsible for the...

In my experience, teachers never assign a question like this if the answer is anything other than “to some extent.” In other words, whatever the proposition after the stem is, it is always partly true and partly untrue. So, if there is a question that asks “to what extent was the US responsible for the Allied victory in WWII in Europe,” I assume that the instructor believes that the US was partly responsible for the victory, but that there were also ways in which the US was not responsible. Alternatively, imagine if you are asked “to what extent were Romeo and Juliet responsible for their own deaths?” In that case, I would expect that the teacher believes the couple was partly responsible but that other factors contributed to their demise.


When I assign questions like this, I expect to see my students examine both sides of the issue. I expect them to provide reasons why the statement is untrue and why it is true. So, with the Romeo and Juliet example, I would expect a student to provide reasons why the two main characters were responsible for their own deaths, but I would also expect to see some blame placed on such people as their parents and Friar Laurence. With the WWII question, I would want to see discussion of the importance of the US contribution, but I would also expect students to discuss how important Soviet involvement was and how badly the Soviets weakened the German military. I, personally, do not expect students to give a specific answer to the “to what extent question.” I do not expect them to say that the US was, for example, 70% responsible. If a student concludes that the US was more responsible than any other country, that is enough for me. However, different instructors may have different expectations.


So, I approach this type of question by trying to find arguments both for and against the proposition. I set out both sets of arguments in my essay and I try to decide, if possible, whether the proposition is, on balance, mostly true or mostly false.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more