Skip to main content

What are three ways the Three Witches deceive people in the play Macbeth?

In Act 1, scene 1, the Weird Sisters discuss their future meeting with Macbeth, saying, "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" (1.1.12).  What they mean is that good things are actually going to look bad, and bad things are going to seem good.  Therefore, when they tell Macbeth that he is going to be king, it seems really good.  However, it actually turns out to be quite bad because it drives Macbeth to find...

In Act 1, scene 1, the Weird Sisters discuss their future meeting with Macbeth, saying, "Fair is foul, and foul is fair" (1.1.12).  What they mean is that good things are actually going to look bad, and bad things are going to seem good.  Therefore, when they tell Macbeth that he is going to be king, it seems really good.  However, it actually turns out to be quite bad because it drives Macbeth to find a way to make it come true.  Banquo hits the nail on the head when he says that sometimes "to win us to our harm, / The instruments of darkness tell us truths, / Win us with honest trifles, to betray ’s / In deepest consequence" (1.5.125-129).  In other words, the witches have told Macbeth one small truth -- that he will be named Thane of Cawdor (which has actually already happened; Macbeth just doesn't know it yet) in order to convince him to believe that the larger prediction is also true.  In this way, they can deceive and manipulate him.


Later, when the witches conjure three apparitions, knowing that Macbeth is returning to them for information, two of the apparitions are absolutely deceptive.  The second one says, "Be bloody, bold, and resolute. Laugh to scorn / The power of man, for none of woman born / Shall harm Macbeth" (4.1.81-83).  This makes it sound as though Macbeth can never be harmed by anyone because every person alive was born of a woman.  He takes it as an assurance when, really, it is just a craftily worded statement of fact. 


Then, the third apparition says, "Macbeth shall never vanquished be until / Great Birnam Wood to high Dunsinane Hill / Shall come against him" (4.1.96-98).  Again, this statement is designed to make Macbeth feel invincible because it seems impossible that the trees could uproot themselves and move of their own volition to Macbeth's castle.  Therefore, he takes it as an assurance of safety when it is really just enigmatically worded.  The sisters purposely deceive him in order to get him to let down his guard. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more