Skip to main content

What is a summary of "As I Was Walking" by Walter de la Mare?

The poem presents a tongue-in-cheek account of Master Rabbit's overreaction to seeing a human out for a walk. As the poem opens, the narrator, a human, (let's assume he's a man), is enjoying a walk out in nature at the end of a summer day. The man recounts the sights, sounds, and smells that he takes in as he walks: "grasshoppers talking," the smell of roses and thyme, and the amber wings of the linnets...

The poem presents a tongue-in-cheek account of Master Rabbit's overreaction to seeing a human out for a walk. As the poem opens, the narrator, a human, (let's assume he's a man), is enjoying a walk out in nature at the end of a summer day. The man recounts the sights, sounds, and smells that he takes in as he walks: "grasshoppers talking," the smell of roses and thyme, and the amber wings of the linnets as they hop from bush to bush. The narrator then sees a rabbit, whom he dignifies and personifies by calling "Master Rabbit," sitting in the opening of his warren. The conditions are favorable for rabbits that evening, and the narrator implies the rabbit would have liked to sally forth from his den to enjoy the sweet turf that lies beyond. However, seeing the man, Master Rabbit immediately recognizes him as a "foe," and darts back into his hole. The narrator sees a "snowy flit of a scut," that is, the rabbit's tail, as it retreats. But the narrator also hears a "stamp, stamp, stamp!" coming up from underground as Master Rabbit signals a warning to other animals that there is "a Murderer near." The irony is that the man has no intention of doing any harm to the rabbit; his apparent enjoyment of the setting and his respectful manner of addressing the rabbit attest to his lack of animosity. But the rabbit's natural inclination is to view all men as murderers, so there is no potential for either of them to enjoy the other's company or even for them to enjoy the same parcel of nature on this beautiful summer evening. The poem's tone suggests the narrator understands Master Rabbit's fear but perhaps wishes things did not have to be that way.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more