Skip to main content

Could the Holocaust have been avoided? If so, how?

The Holocaust could certainly have been avoided.  It was definitely not inevitable in the same way that, for example, we might say that the American Civil War was inevitable.  Here are three ways in which the Holocaust could have been avoided.


First, the Holocaust could have been avoided if the Allies had been less harsh on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles.  If the Allies had not been so harsh, the German people would have...

The Holocaust could certainly have been avoided.  It was definitely not inevitable in the same way that, for example, we might say that the American Civil War was inevitable.  Here are three ways in which the Holocaust could have been avoided.


First, the Holocaust could have been avoided if the Allies had been less harsh on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles.  If the Allies had not been so harsh, the German people would have been less angry at the world.  If they had been less angry, they would have been much less likely to turn to radical political parties like the Nazi Party.  If the Nazis had not come to power, the Holocaust would surely not have happened.


Second, the Holocaust could have been avoided if the French and British had not engaged in appeasement in the time before Hitler had rebuilt the German military.  Hitler came to power in 1933.  In late 1936, he sent the German military back into the Rhineland.  This was a direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles.  At that point, the French and the British would have been justified in using military force to make Hitler remove those troops.  If they had, Hitler might have lost popularity in Germany.  He would have been exposed as a reckless gambler who could not prevent the Allies from telling Germany what to do.  In 1936, the German military was much too weak to have dominated France and England, so the Allies could have easily repelled the German threat.  By doing this, they would have humiliated Hitler and probably caused him to lose credibility in Germany.  This would have prevented the Nazis from becoming powerful enough to carry out the Holocaust.


Finally, the Holocaust could have been prevented by better moral decisions on the part of German leaders and people.  Hitler could not have carried out the Holocaust by himself.  If his higher subordinates had pushed back against his wishes, he would have had to back down.  The Holocaust came about because of the decisions of various people, all acting of their own free will.  If they had been better people with more moral fiber, they would have made different choices and the Holocaust would not have happened.


These are three possible ways in which the Holocaust could have been prevented/avoided. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...