Skip to main content

Could the Holocaust have been avoided? If so, how?

The Holocaust could certainly have been avoided.  It was definitely not inevitable in the same way that, for example, we might say that the American Civil War was inevitable.  Here are three ways in which the Holocaust could have been avoided.


First, the Holocaust could have been avoided if the Allies had been less harsh on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles.  If the Allies had not been so harsh, the German people would have...

The Holocaust could certainly have been avoided.  It was definitely not inevitable in the same way that, for example, we might say that the American Civil War was inevitable.  Here are three ways in which the Holocaust could have been avoided.


First, the Holocaust could have been avoided if the Allies had been less harsh on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles.  If the Allies had not been so harsh, the German people would have been less angry at the world.  If they had been less angry, they would have been much less likely to turn to radical political parties like the Nazi Party.  If the Nazis had not come to power, the Holocaust would surely not have happened.


Second, the Holocaust could have been avoided if the French and British had not engaged in appeasement in the time before Hitler had rebuilt the German military.  Hitler came to power in 1933.  In late 1936, he sent the German military back into the Rhineland.  This was a direct violation of the Treaty of Versailles.  At that point, the French and the British would have been justified in using military force to make Hitler remove those troops.  If they had, Hitler might have lost popularity in Germany.  He would have been exposed as a reckless gambler who could not prevent the Allies from telling Germany what to do.  In 1936, the German military was much too weak to have dominated France and England, so the Allies could have easily repelled the German threat.  By doing this, they would have humiliated Hitler and probably caused him to lose credibility in Germany.  This would have prevented the Nazis from becoming powerful enough to carry out the Holocaust.


Finally, the Holocaust could have been prevented by better moral decisions on the part of German leaders and people.  Hitler could not have carried out the Holocaust by himself.  If his higher subordinates had pushed back against his wishes, he would have had to back down.  The Holocaust came about because of the decisions of various people, all acting of their own free will.  If they had been better people with more moral fiber, they would have made different choices and the Holocaust would not have happened.


These are three possible ways in which the Holocaust could have been prevented/avoided. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Martel's Life of Pi, how does writing a diary help Pi Patel build on his leadership skills?

At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can... At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can do this by writing down events, problems and solutions, and reflections to look back on when confronted with repeated problems. It can ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why did Tybalt attack and kill Mercutio instead of Romeo, who he had originally been targeting?

Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio... Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio and Benvolio, Mercutio responds "And but one word with one of us?/ Couple it w...
Post a Comment
Read more