Skip to main content

I have to present a discussion to my class about chapter 29 from To Kill A Mockingbird and I need some good questions from that chapter that are...

One question that can inspire lively debate has its roots in an earlier chapter when Tom Robinson is convicted of raping Mayella Ewell. Jem had been thoroughly convinced that based on the evidence presented and his complete faith in his father's prowess as a lawyer that Tom would be acquitted. When Tom was convicted, it was an attack on everything he believed: that his father was unbeatable; that the legal system was fair; that innocent people were not convicted of crimes; that his friends, neighbors, and acquaintances in Maycomb were good and fair people. Jem lost his faith in the humanity of humans. Because Jem remains unconscious at the end of the novel, we do not get to hear any last revelations from him. But how might the actions of Boo Radley  to save Jem and Scout have helped to restore some of Jem's faith in humanity, and why?

Another question that begs to be asked centers on another quote by Mr. Tate, but it, too, has a parallel in an earlier chapter when Bob Ewell is testifying about Tom Robinson's alleged behavior with Mayella. Here, Mr. Tate and Atticus are discussing Bob Ewell's attempt to kill Jem and Scout, and while Atticus can't bring himself to understand how a man could try to kill a child, Mr. Tate responds, “Mr. Finch, there’s just some kind of men you have to shoot before you can say hidy to ‘em. Even then, they ain’t worth the bullet it takes to shoot ’em. Ewell ‘as one of ’em" (Lee, 1960, p. 273). How does this quote reveal Tate's mindset about Ewell that is similar to Ewell's mindset about Tom Robinson?


Another couple of questions that can be considered in light of the action in this chapter is how Boo Radley and Tom Robinson are similar characters and how their characters differ. You could look both at their personal characteristics and personalities as well as their treatment at the hands of the townspeople, including Jem, Scout, and the other kids.


Chapter 29 on its own is not rich with action, but if you consider the statements made in it in light of previous chapters, there is much to be debated.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more