Skip to main content

Is it more socially acceptable to be bad at math than it is say to be bad at English or reading?

Unless you socialize primarily with mathematicians, physicists, or any other profession for which the routine application of mathematical principles is an integral component, it is difficult to imagine one being socially ostracized for being deficient in math. After all, many learned professionals struggle with math, yet do not find themselves socially-isolated or looked-down-upon by their peers at cocktail parties or at formal events. One of the websites to which a link is provided below, in...

Unless you socialize primarily with mathematicians, physicists, or any other profession for which the routine application of mathematical principles is an integral component, it is difficult to imagine one being socially ostracized for being deficient in math. After all, many learned professionals struggle with math, yet do not find themselves socially-isolated or looked-down-upon by their peers at cocktail parties or at formal events. One of the websites to which a link is provided below, in fact, lists six prominent scientific figures from modern history who struggled with math, including Charles Darwin, Alexander Graham Bell, and Thomas Edison. Nobody would suggest that such figures were unwelcome at social events or were bad at socializing on account of their inability to perform advanced calculus. In short, it was and remains socially-acceptable to bad at math.


The question, then, is whether those who are not well-read or speak poorly are more or less likely to be deficient in social settings or be socially-accepted than those who are bad at math. Again, unless one is immersed on a routine basis in an environment dominated by mathematicians or physicists, it is difficult to believe that being deficient at math would be socially unacceptable. And, it is difficult to imagine a social gathering dominated by mathematicians would be particularly exciting, anyway, although, it is possible that such a gathering could be entertaining. Outside of a gathering of mathematicians, therefore, there would be a premium on being well-spoken and well-read. People at a gathering are far more likely to discuss sports, current affairs, movies or their favorite books than they are quantum mechanics. Being inarticulate and ignorant of literature and the fine arts, or of issues of national or local importance will almost certainly result in one being more socially-isolated than if that individual struggles with mathematical equations.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more