Skip to main content

A bullet is fired horizontally from a gun at exactly the same time that a similar bullet is allowed to fall to the ground from the same height....

This is the sort of question that is better answered through experiment than theory, since it's fairly simple to test and would provide an actual answer instead of a hypothesis. I've linked a clip from a television program in which this experiment was conducted, and confirmed the prediction that we would derive from math: both bullets hit the ground at the same time.


This probably seems counter-intuitive because we think that, by traveling so much...

This is the sort of question that is better answered through experiment than theory, since it's fairly simple to test and would provide an actual answer instead of a hypothesis. I've linked a clip from a television program in which this experiment was conducted, and confirmed the prediction that we would derive from math: both bullets hit the ground at the same time.


This probably seems counter-intuitive because we think that, by traveling so much faster, the fired bullet must have some kind of different property relating to its vertical speed. In fact, the horizontal speed of the fired bullet is a completely different property, unrelated to gravity, that only determines how far the bullet is able to travel in a given amount of time. This is why muzzle velocity and elevation are so important in determining the strategic uses of various firearms.


Mathematically, we could use the equation X = Vi - .5at^2 to solve this;


The initial speed of both bullets is 0 (they are at rest relative to the ground), so the equation simplifies to X = -.5at^2


a is 9.8m/s on average, so half of that becomes 4.9


We could assign any value to X, so in this example I'll say it's 1.5 meters, the height of a reasonably sized person.


1.5 = 4.9t^2


therefore, t = 0.55 seconds


This seems like a pretty short timespan, but considering that a modern gun can fire over 1000m/s, this means the fired bullet will be over 500 meters, or 1500 feet, away from you by the time it hits the ground.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more