Skip to main content

Why did Australia become involved in the Vietnam War?

There are two main reasons why Australia got involved in the Vietnam War.  The first had to do with preventing the spread of communism while the second had to do with Australia’s relationship with the United States.


In the 1960s, the United States was Australia’s most important geopolitical ally. This was during the Cold War and the US was the leader of the “free world.”  Australia was on the side of the US.  This meant...

There are two main reasons why Australia got involved in the Vietnam War.  The first had to do with preventing the spread of communism while the second had to do with Australia’s relationship with the United States.


In the 1960s, the United States was Australia’s most important geopolitical ally. This was during the Cold War and the US was the leader of the “free world.”  Australia was on the side of the US.  This meant that the country would be inclined to follow American policies in most cases.  Australia felt that it was important to get involved in Vietnam, in part because they were following America’s lead.


However, Australia might well have gotten involved in Vietnam even if the US had not wanted them to.  This was because Australia was a staunchly anticommunist country.  Australia was fully committed to democracy and capitalism and did not want communism to spread around the world.  Moreover, since Vietnam is much closer to Australia than to the US, Vietnam’s fate was much more important to Australia.  If Vietnam became communist, thereby causing all of Southeast Asia to do the same (domino theory), Australia’s security would be imperiled.  For this reason, Australia was just as (and perhaps more) motivated to fight in Vietnam as the US was.


Australia got involved in Vietnam, then, because its major world ally did and, more importantly, because it felt that its security would be threatened if communism spread further throughout the region.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more