Skip to main content

Did Oscar Wilde's self-proclaimed anarchy and individualism affect his play, The Importance of Being Earnest? If so, how?

One can definitely see elements of anarchy and individualism at work in Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. First of all, much of the play lampoons the attitudes and manners of the upper classes, as it hilariously comments on and exposes the trivialities of the rich. There are some elements of anarchy in this comedic process, as Wilde's depiction of the upper classes demolishes the wealthy establishment by revealing its shallow lack of substance....

One can definitely see elements of anarchy and individualism at work in Oscar Wilde's The Importance of Being Earnest. First of all, much of the play lampoons the attitudes and manners of the upper classes, as it hilariously comments on and exposes the trivialities of the rich. There are some elements of anarchy in this comedic process, as Wilde's depiction of the upper classes demolishes the wealthy establishment by revealing its shallow lack of substance. Of course, it's important to note that, even if Wilde is demolishing the foundations of the upper classes, he never does so with venom. Rather, the play maintains a light and funny tone, and so any criticisms are subtle and are often delivered, most surprisingly, in an affectionate manner. 


Additionally, Wilde's individualism can be observed in his perfectly crafted dialogue and writing. Time and again, Wilde has his characters engaging in surprising, witty, and often scandalous turns of phrase. More specifically, his characters are continuously doing that which we least expect them to do. For instance, when Algernon and Jack's love interests simultaneously rebuke their deceptions, the two men deal with their feelings by squabbling over muffins. Surprising moments like these and the masterful language that accompanies them truly bring out Wilde's unique and individualistic spirit. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more