Skip to main content

How does Jack’s reaction to Simon’s death differ from the reaction of his followers in Lord of the Flies?

After the brutal murder of Simon, Jack insists that their gate must be defended and secured so that the other boys and the "beast" doesn't sneak in. The boys are all in agreement after Jack asks them if they remember how the "beast" crawled. Jack then mentions that the "beast" disguised itself and says that there is a possibility of it coming again. Stanley raises his finger and says, "But didn't we, didn't we---?" (Golding...

After the brutal murder of Simon, Jack insists that their gate must be defended and secured so that the other boys and the "beast" doesn't sneak in. The boys are all in agreement after Jack asks them if they remember how the "beast" crawled. Jack then mentions that the "beast" disguised itself and says that there is a possibility of it coming again. Stanley raises his finger and says, "But didn't we, didn't we---?" (Golding 160). Jack's immediate response is "No!" (Golding 160). The rest of the savages wince at the thought of murdering Simon and Jack begins to deny the fact that they even killed the "beast." Upon hearing this idea, the savages start to mumble and seem worried. Sensing their fear, Jack tells them to keep away from the top of the mountain and to give the beast the head of the pig if they go hunting. Stanley then says, "I expect the beast disguised itself" (Golding 161). Jack responds by saying, "We'd better keep on the right side of him, anyhow. You can't tell what he might do" (Golding 161). The savages consider his words and remain afraid. Jack knows that his words have an immense effect on the boys, and they will blindly believe everything he says.


Jack reacts callously to Simon's death and does not feel guilty about murdering him. However, his followers feel guilty and try their best to repress their memories of the horrific event. The savages are aware of the roles they played in Simon's death, but believe that the "beast" did, in fact, disguise itself. Stanley and the savages initially feel relieved that they killed the "beast" until Jack tells them that it is still alive. Jack understands the importance of using the boys' fear to control them, which is why he suggests that the "beast" has some sort of mythical power which allows it to disguise itself. Jack is essentially ensuring that the boys will always remain fearful and under his control. Instead of feeling guilty and upset about murdering Simon like the rest of his followers, Jack uses Simon's death to perpetuate the belief in the "beast."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...