Skip to main content

How does the sequence in the fossil record provide evidence for Darwin’s theory?

There are a variety of ways to interpret the fossil record in a way that supports Darwin's theory.


One of the primary considerations is the Law of Superposition, which says that, in the absence of disruptive forces such as plate tectonics altering the orientation of fossil layers, the oldest material should be on the bottom, and the newest material on the top. This is typically demonstrated upon observation through several means, such as radiometric dating,...

There are a variety of ways to interpret the fossil record in a way that supports Darwin's theory.


One of the primary considerations is the Law of Superposition, which says that, in the absence of disruptive forces such as plate tectonics altering the orientation of fossil layers, the oldest material should be on the bottom, and the newest material on the top. This is typically demonstrated upon observation through several means, such as radiometric dating, as well as observing the nature of the fossils themselves. If the Law of Superposition were not in place, we would expect to find human skeletons in one-billion-year-old rock, but instead we find bacteria and nothing else. This supports the idea of evolution in that it demonstrates how life "builds upon" earlier forms. Note that we should be careful to avoid the terms "improving" or "getting better" because these are relative and imply qualitative judgement based on our own anthropocentric stereotypes; bacteria are just as good at "being alive" as humans are, they simply lack the structural complexity that we have, and that complexity should, logically, develop from simpler structures, rather than the other way around. The fossil record directly demonstrates that "simple" species, such as bacteria, do not descend from "complex" species like humans, and that this trend appears to be consistent for the entire history of the earth. 


Another way the fossil record supported Darwin was the existence of extinct species. This demonstrates that not all life is permanent and that competition can definitively lead to the complete death of life that is not suited for its environment. What was most definitive in Darwin's time was the fact that fossil species which had never been observed as living animals were being discovered, demonstrating that species had been experiencing these forces long before human-recorded history. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more