Skip to main content

How does the sequence in the fossil record provide evidence for Darwin’s theory?

There are a variety of ways to interpret the fossil record in a way that supports Darwin's theory.


One of the primary considerations is the Law of Superposition, which says that, in the absence of disruptive forces such as plate tectonics altering the orientation of fossil layers, the oldest material should be on the bottom, and the newest material on the top. This is typically demonstrated upon observation through several means, such as radiometric dating,...

There are a variety of ways to interpret the fossil record in a way that supports Darwin's theory.


One of the primary considerations is the Law of Superposition, which says that, in the absence of disruptive forces such as plate tectonics altering the orientation of fossil layers, the oldest material should be on the bottom, and the newest material on the top. This is typically demonstrated upon observation through several means, such as radiometric dating, as well as observing the nature of the fossils themselves. If the Law of Superposition were not in place, we would expect to find human skeletons in one-billion-year-old rock, but instead we find bacteria and nothing else. This supports the idea of evolution in that it demonstrates how life "builds upon" earlier forms. Note that we should be careful to avoid the terms "improving" or "getting better" because these are relative and imply qualitative judgement based on our own anthropocentric stereotypes; bacteria are just as good at "being alive" as humans are, they simply lack the structural complexity that we have, and that complexity should, logically, develop from simpler structures, rather than the other way around. The fossil record directly demonstrates that "simple" species, such as bacteria, do not descend from "complex" species like humans, and that this trend appears to be consistent for the entire history of the earth. 


Another way the fossil record supported Darwin was the existence of extinct species. This demonstrates that not all life is permanent and that competition can definitively lead to the complete death of life that is not suited for its environment. What was most definitive in Darwin's time was the fact that fossil species which had never been observed as living animals were being discovered, demonstrating that species had been experiencing these forces long before human-recorded history. 

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How did the United States become an imperial power?

"Imperial power" is a bit of a vague label. It tends to mean several things at once, so let's unpack it. In the sense of "this country was built on conquest by force," the "imperial power" part of America actually predates the United States proper. The territories that would become the United States were imperial colonies, established by the great European empires of the 17th and 18th centuries. Much of the US Constitution and American governance generally goes back to England, history's largest and most successful imperial power, but vital aspects of American culture come from other imperial powers, such as France and Spain. Much of American culture comes from sources other than the old empires, but they were key influences on what the United States became. In the sense of "this country treats conquest by force as a fundamental component of its culture, economy and politics," the United States has always been an imperial power. Even earl...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more