Skip to main content

What were the major problems facing the nation in April 1865? What factors stood in the way of a solution to those problems? Provide examples...

This period from 1865 to 1877 is usually called Reconstruction.

The obvious problem for America in April 1865 is the assassination of a President: Abraham Lincoln was murdered on April 14, 1865. The sudden death of a country's leader can only bring turmoil even in the best of times---and this was certainly not the best of times.

The United States had just emerged from its one and only civil war, the first major war US soldiers had fought in 50 years. One major problem that arose was what to do with these Southern states: They had started part of the US, seceded to form their own Confederacy, and now were occupied by Union troops at the conclusion of the war. The question of how to re-integrate them into the United States loomed large, and raised a number of sub-questions about whether and how much they should be penalized for their rebellion, what sort of reforms they should be required to undertake, what sort of governance the newly re-integrated states should have. After taking office President Andrew Johnson pardoned thousands of Confederate officials (mostly civil servants and minor military officers), while prosecuting the top brass and major political leaders. He also formed the Ten Percent Plan requiring loyalty oaths from ten percent of each Southern state's population. Like most compromises, this angered both sides; the Radical Republicans wanted the South punished more severely and oaths of a majority, while Democrats thought the whole idea of prosecuting Confederate leaders and demanding loyalty oaths was unfair.

The war had caused massive economic devastation, as wars usually do; so another question was also how to rebuild the South and what the new economic structure there should look like.

And of course how can I forget the chief reason the war was fought in the first place: Slavery. (Revisionists will often point to other reasons, and some of these may have contributed, but it is very clear that slavery was the primary point of contention between Northern and Southern states---that "states' rights" in this case largely meant states' rights to have slavery.)


At the conclusion of the war, slavery had just been fully abolished across the United States; so now the question became what to do with all these people who had previously been slaves. Ideally we would provide them with education, give them property to start out with, help them become full citizens of society; but this would be very difficult and expensive to do, and was resisted for other reasons as well. (Funny thing, a lot of the plantation owners were not thrilled about having their land and wealth redistributed to their former slaves! Of course that was precisely what we needed to do, but they fought tooth and nail to prevent it.)


The result of this contention was mixed results; while many former slaves did manage to get educated, find jobs, and make a living, many others were unable to because of barriers placed in their way, including laws discriminating against Black people in many states (and not only Southern states!). A lot of Americans don't know that there was a Civil Rights Act of 1875 which sought to ban racial discrimination in public places---but was largely unenforced and later ruled un-Constitutional by the Supreme Court. (Why? I'm trying to find a better reason than "racism", but it's not easy.)

In 1877, Union troops were ordered to end their occupation of the South and restore local control; this is usually considered the end of Reconstruction.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...