Skip to main content

How and why are the members of the community in Louis Lowry's The Giver unable to make individual choices?

In The Giver, the members of the community have ceded all control to the elders, who are the rulers of the community.  This is apparently a choice that their ancestors made a very long time ago, according to the Giver, who says, 


Our people made that choice, the choice to go to Sameness. Before my time, before the previous time, back and back and back.... We gained control of many things. But we had...

In The Giver, the members of the community have ceded all control to the elders, who are the rulers of the community.  This is apparently a choice that their ancestors made a very long time ago, according to the Giver, who says, 



Our people made that choice, the choice to go to Sameness. Before my time, before the previous time, back and back and back.... We gained control of many things. But we had to let go of others (Lowry 95). 



The Giver is speaking of Sameness, of course, and Sameness is the consequence of the elders having removed choices from the people.  As I imagine this, some external force or conditions caused these people to think that they would be more secure, peaceful, and productive a society if they gave up choices and allowed their rulers to tell them what to do.  This was a tradeoff, as the Giver notes.  There is clearly enough food and shelter in the community for everyone, as well as education and some amenities of life. The people have given up choice for these forms of security.  From the elders' perspective, it is far easier to control a community that has no choices. If everyone has the same housing, furniture, food, and clothing, there is nothing to argue about. There is a perception of equality that helps the elders rule effectively. The elders can observe everyone's skills and talents and choose a profession for each, which is a more efficient allocation of human resources. They can choose partners for the people based on some sort of compatibility, which makes each household run more smoothly. Some women are chosen to bear children because they can produce better physical specimens, while women who do not bear the children can use whatever skills they have more productively.  This community is, in essence, a dictatorship.  If people do not want to endure this, there is the threat of release, just as in any other dictatorship, in which people who do not follow the rules can be and are put to death.  All of these are choices that most societies allow people to make themselves, which is, of course, not necessarily efficient or peaceful.  A society is messy when people make their own choices, and this community has avoided that.  It is a bad bargain, though, as Jonas comes to understand during his time with the Giver.   

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...