Skip to main content

Insecurity is the price of globalization. Is it worth paying?

There is no way to answer this question in an objective way.  It is probably possible to objectively state the costs and benefits of globalization (though not everyone will agree on what those are).  However, it is not possible to objectively decide whether the benefits are greater than the costs.


The benefits of globalization are generally spread around and hard to see.  Globalization helps us because it allows us to have high-quality goods for the...

There is no way to answer this question in an objective way.  It is probably possible to objectively state the costs and benefits of globalization (though not everyone will agree on what those are).  However, it is not possible to objectively decide whether the benefits are greater than the costs.


The benefits of globalization are generally spread around and hard to see.  Globalization helps us because it allows us to have high-quality goods for the lowest possible price.  If we did not have globalization, we would be paying higher prices for almost everything we own.  As we can see in the articles in the links below, some experts believe that an iPhone produced in the United States would cost at least twice as much as an iPhone made by foreign workers who work for lower wages.  Because so many things are produced outside the US (because of globalization) we are able to have a high standard of living with many material possessions.  We would not be able to have such a high standard of living without globalization.  However, it is hard to know how much worse-off we would be.


The costs of globalization are easily visible.  When a company moves its factories to China, it is easy to see the people who have lost their jobs.  It is easy to understand how much they have been harmed by globalization.  In our globalized world, more and more of us face insecurity because we know our jobs could potentially be sent to another country.  We can easily imagine how hard life would be for us if we lost our jobs.  This cost is very easy to understand.


So which of these effects is more important?  Globalization has given us a higher standard of living.  On the other hand, it has made us have to fear that we will lose our jobs to foreign workers.  Is the higher standard of living worth the fear of losing our jobs?  What is your opinion on this issue?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more