Skip to main content

In Romeo and Juliet, what has been changed, kept, and taken away in different versions?

I'll focus on the two most popular movie adaptations of Shakespeare's play, the 1968 Zeffirelli version and the 1996 Baz Luhrmann version with Leonardo DiCaprio as Romeo. The Zeffirelli film is probably the most faithful. It was filmed in Italy in a setting that has the look of Verona during the Renaissance. The actors look much as you might expect. Olivia Hussey looks almost young enough to play Juliet (she was sixteen during the filming), Leonard Whiting portrays an emotional and impetuous Romeo, and John McEnery is brilliant as Mercutio.

The first Act is almost word for word up until the scene at Capulet's party, where Zeffirelli adds a "troubadour" who would have been a common attraction at such a gathering. He sings a song called "What Is a Youth," which is a delightful Renaissance-type ballad and employs lyrics which are very much in line with the plot and theme of the play. Likewise, Acts II and III are virtually word for word. The fight scene in Act III, Scene 1 is audaciously staged and lasts much longer, with plenty of action, than the written version. As the movie progresses, however, Zeffirelli begins cutting scenes. It's almost as if he didn't want the movie to last too long. It totally eliminates Juliet's soliloquy in Act IV, Scene 3, which is a shame, because it is beautifully written and demonstrates Juliet's fears and courage.


Act V not only cuts things, but also changes the original in two ways. Zeffirelli eliminates Romeo's fight with Count Paris outside the tomb and also eliminates the Friar's explanation of the preceding events in Scene 3. Scene 2 is also cut in favor of explaining Friar John's inability to get Romeo the letter explaining Friar's Laurence plan by showing that Friar John's mule was too slow to reach Romeo in time. Finally, in the funeral scene at the end of the movie, which is added, we find Lady Montague quite alive. In fact, apart from Romeo and Juliet's words in the tomb, most of Scene 3 is cut from this version.


Where to begin with Baz Luhrmann's version? It is quite different, although he tries to stay faithful to Shakespeare's language. Here's ten definite additions and changes:


  • Verona is a modern city named Verona Beach.

  • Cars, guns and helicopters are used instead of horses and swords.

  • The names of the servants in Act I, Scene 1 are swapped. Abram is a Capulet instead of a Montague. 

  • The Prince is actually a police captain.

  • Mercutio and Romeo drop acid before Capulet's party.

  • The balcony scene is filmed in a swimming pool.

  • A song called "Everybody's Free" is used prominently.

  • Mercutio is stabbed with a piece of glass instead of a sword.

  • Instead of Friar John, FedEx is unable to deliver the Friar's letter to Romeo.

  • Juliet is laid out in a church instead of a tomb.

Of course, the biggest alteration to the original Shakespeare is Romeo's dying scene. In this movie, he actually sees Juliet wake up just as he has taken the poison. He realizes that she is still alive and that he has made a terrible mistake. Juliet then promptly shoots herself with his gun.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more