Skip to main content

In "Lamb to the Slaughter," Mary Maloney's dialogue is distinctive in this story. Her way of speaking to others doesn't change, even after she has...

The consistent nature of Mary's dialogue helps the reader to compare and contrast her, before and after the crime. In doing so, the reader can also make conjectures about Mary's state of mind, her true character, and the internal factors that motivate her to be how she is. 


The way that she is able to control the atmosphere of the house, and the manner in which she maintains consistency in the midst of chaos, helps...

The consistent nature of Mary's dialogue helps the reader to compare and contrast her, before and after the crime. In doing so, the reader can also make conjectures about Mary's state of mind, her true character, and the internal factors that motivate her to be how she is. 


The way that she is able to control the atmosphere of the house, and the manner in which she maintains consistency in the midst of chaos, helps the reader see right through Mary's manipulative nature. Sweet and subservient as she may be, she still holds the strings tightly throughout very chaotic times. One must question whether her submissive behavior has a bigger and more direct purpose. This, however, is never revealed. 


Therefore, the effect that the writer creates is one of speculation. The reader no longer has complete knowledge or understanding of the character as her lack of affective tuning, or reacting according to the situation, renders her hard to predict.



And in the other room, Mary Maloney began to giggle.



The speculation that is created from the strange behavior from Mary is what makes the character so mysterious and enigmatic, creating a completely different atmosphere in the reading of the story from beginning to end. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more