Skip to main content

What were some characteristics of missionary movements in the modern period? What was their relationship with colonialism?

The American missionary movement was influenced by the Puritans' ideal of being "a city upon a hill." They believed that they could be an example to the rest of the world and bring "civilization" wherever they went. This goal brought together the idea of religious proselytizing with the process of building a nation or an empire. In the United States, evangelical Protestants were particularly active as missionaries, and they saw it as their mission to accompany the process of American nation-building as the country expanded west. Presbyterians, Baptists, Methodists, and Mormons were all active in the process of bringing their religions with them in the process of westward expansion. They attempted to proselytize Native Americans and others in the process of moving westward.

In the 19th century, missionary activity also spread overseas with the growth of colonialism. In 1810, the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM) was founded, in the example of the London Missionary Society (which had been founded nearly two decades earlier). This organization organized American missionary activity for the next 50 years. Starting in 1812, American missionaries went to India, Burma, Hawaii, and later to China, Korea, Japan, the Middle East, and Africa. By the late 1800s, the goal of their activities was to bring American "progress," in the forms of hospitals and schools, along with Christianity. About 60% of missionaries in the late 1800s were women, and their activities abroad led to calls for women's suffrage in the United States and to increased power for women in American church life. Most missionaries by this point were not proponents of multiculturalism, but actively sought to promote American values along with Christianity. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more