Skip to main content

In De Niro's Game by Rawi Hage, what is the function of George?

In the novel De Niro’s Game,George functions as a symbol of how power though illegal means (and especially during war) can corrupt the young.  Within the friendship of George and Bassam, it is the character of George that functions as the instigator.  George also turns friendship into betrayal in Beirut during the Lebanese civil war.  Bassam is drawn into criminal ways only through George.  It is not long before George has initiated his friend...

In the novel De Niro’s Game, George functions as a symbol of how power though illegal means (and especially during war) can corrupt the young.  Within the friendship of George and Bassam, it is the character of George that functions as the instigator.  George also turns friendship into betrayal in Beirut during the Lebanese civil war.  Bassam is drawn into criminal ways only through George.  It is not long before George has initiated his friend into the world of smuggling both drugs and alcohol.  While Bassam loses his nerve, George gains power in the militia.  Unfortunately, he loses his morality at the same time.  George eventually participates in the Phalangist massacre and kills Laurent Aoudeh after a strange sexual escapade.  He also mercilessly allows Bassam to take the heat for George’s own crimes (while at the same time stealing Bassam’s girlfriend, Rana).  As Bassam begins to stalk George, Bassam finds that George is even more into political corruption than once thought.  Just as George’s own character shows how power can truly corrupt and lead to death, the game of Russian roulette (otherwise known as “De Niro’s Game”) the two play together ends with George being the unlucky one, killing himself by a bullet through the head.  Bassam then struggles to remain moral in an immoral world of war.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more