Skip to main content

What happens if a country's constitution changes constantly?

If a country’s constitution changes constantly, it soon becomes as if the country had no constitution at all.  This does not necessarily doom a country, but it makes the country’s government less stable.


A constitution is, in essence, the ground rules for a country’s government.  It is supposed to set out the basic structure of the government and the basic rules for what a government can and cannot do.  For example, the United States Constitution...

If a country’s constitution changes constantly, it soon becomes as if the country had no constitution at all.  This does not necessarily doom a country, but it makes the country’s government less stable.


A constitution is, in essence, the ground rules for a country’s government.  It is supposed to set out the basic structure of the government and the basic rules for what a government can and cannot do.  For example, the United States Constitution sets up a governmental system with three branches of government and federalism.  It further establishes rules such as the rule that the government cannot infringe on your right to free speech and the rule that it cannot try you twice for the same crime.


A constitution is important for a country because (if it is a proper constitution) it lets us know what our governmental system will be like.  It gives us a sense of security because we always know what to expect, in broad terms, from our government.  We do not know everything about what the government will do.  It might raise or lower taxes. It might change the rules on immigration.  It might get us into or out of a given war.  All that said, however, we still know that there are certain rules that will always be there and that gives us a sense of security.


If a country’s constitution changes constantly, the country’s people will lose this sense of security.  They will no longer have the feeling that their system of government will remain essentially the same.  Imagine if tomorrow the US Constitution changed and the states no longer had rights.  Then two months from now Congress became unicameral.  And a few months after that the states got their powers back again.  Americans would no longer feel as if they knew what their government would be like.  This would make them nervous and less secure.  The country would not necessarily fall apart, particularly in the short run, but it would clearly become less secure and less stable.  This is what will happen if a country’s constitution changes too often.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...
Post a Comment
Read more