Skip to main content

In The Bellarosa Connection, why does Billy Rose refuse to meet Fonstein? Is the memory of the Holocaust too painful for Billy Rose?

In Saul Bellow's novella The Bellarosa Connection, Harry Fonstein desperately desires to meet Billy Rose, the man responsible for saving his life from the Nazi regime. Billy Rose, however, has no desire whatsoever to meet the man he saved. In an exchange with Fonstein's wife, Billy Rose blatantly shows his indifference: "Remember—forget. What's the difference to me? [...] Lady, this is one of a trillion incidents in a life like mine. Why should I...

In Saul Bellow's novella The Bellarosa Connection, Harry Fonstein desperately desires to meet Billy Rose, the man responsible for saving his life from the Nazi regime. Billy Rose, however, has no desire whatsoever to meet the man he saved. In an exchange with Fonstein's wife, Billy Rose blatantly shows his indifference: "Remember—forget. What's the difference to me? [...] Lady, this is one of a trillion incidents in a life like mine. Why should I re-collect it?" (53). In a blatant sense Rose is not interested in meeting, let alone acknowledging Fonstein's wish to thank him because such an act was not unique within the context of his life.


Rose's life revolved around being a celebrity, and though his actions helped many Jews, it is evident that he had reached his limit insofar as the Holocaust was concerned. This sentiment is clear when he tells Fonstein's wife that he had already done all he could—his days of being a benefactor or savior were over. Essentially, Rose did not view the Holocaust as uniquely painful because he was too embroiled in resentment towards those who could have done more. Thus, meeting Fonstein, or any other person whom he had saved, would serve as a reminder of that very fact.


Works Cited


Bellow, Saul. The Bellarosa Connection. New York, N.Y. : Penguin, 1989. Print.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more