Skip to main content

Can you help me develop a critical appreciation of Amiri Baraka's "Somebody Blew Up America" from the perspective of Postcolonialism?

As you probably know, the postcolonial perspective analyzes the effects of economic and physical control over the native inhabitants and the resources of an area. The poem "Somebody Blew Up America" provides a response to the 9/11/2001 terrorist attack in America. Baraka's speaker takes a stance that terrorism can be a reaction to all the oppression that white men have been handing down for centuries to the rest of the world.


The poem is structured...

As you probably know, the postcolonial perspective analyzes the effects of economic and physical control over the native inhabitants and the resources of an area. The poem "Somebody Blew Up America" provides a response to the 9/11/2001 terrorist attack in America. Baraka's speaker takes a stance that terrorism can be a reaction to all the oppression that white men have been handing down for centuries to the rest of the world.


The poem is structured around the central question of "Who?" In the first stanza the speaker sarcastically remarks that certain white extremist groups, such as the KKK and the Skinheads, could never have done such an evil deed. However, as the poem continues, the speaker continually asks questions which include the following:



Who killed the most niggers 
Who killed the most Jews 
Who killed the most Italians 
Who killed the most Irish 
Who killed the most Africans 
Who killed the most Japanese 
Who killed the most Latinos 


Who got rich from Algeria, Libya, Haiti, 
Iran, Iraq, Saudi, Kuwait, Lebanon, 
Syria, Egypt, Jordan, Palestine, 


Who cut off peoples hands in the Congo 
Who invented Aids....



The speaker asks questions so rapidly, due to the omission of most punctuation, that it is plain that he does not expect an answer. Rather he is making a point about American interventions and oppression which may have led, at least in part, to the behaviors of terrorists. The speaker clearly suggests that American imperialism and colonialism created a cloud of hatred and fear that could have given rise to the Twin Tower terrorist attacks. He urges Americans to look at themselves before they attach a label to others.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more