Skip to main content

What are our obligations as citizens? How does liberalism, as presented by Locke and Kant, view our obligations?

Liberalism is largely based on the idea that all men are free, but with that freedom comes a certain set of obligations. While each culture varies on the nature of those obligations, there are some basic obligations that all citizens are believed to possess according to the philosophies of Kant and Locke.


According to the philosophy of John Locke, all men are entitled to pursue life, liberty and property. With those rights come general obligations...

Liberalism is largely based on the idea that all men are free, but with that freedom comes a certain set of obligations. While each culture varies on the nature of those obligations, there are some basic obligations that all citizens are believed to possess according to the philosophies of Kant and Locke.


According to the philosophy of John Locke, all men are entitled to pursue life, liberty and property. With those rights come general obligations that apply to all citizens as well as specialized obligations that must be undertaken voluntarily. Locke believed that those obligations came into effect when one willingly became part of a society and implicitly consented to the rules of that society. For example, Locke believed that resident aliens have an obligation to obey the laws of the states in which they reside and that those who inherit property have the obligation to obey the rules of the commonwealth in which that property is located.


Like most liberal philosophers, Locke also believed that all citizens have the responsibility of preserving the basic rights and others. For example, citizens are entitled to maintain their own property and obligated not to infringe on the rights of another citizen to own his or her own property. Unlike other liberal philosophers, most of Locke's writings indicate a belief that one only gains political obligations, such as the obligation to vote or become active in political processes, after actively consenting to join a political system. All of Locke's beliefs regarding the obligations of citizens were based on rationality.


Kant's beliefs on the obligations of citizens were similar to Locke's in their basis in rationality, but Kant's moral framework was more in depth. Kant believed that there were two primary types of obligation, including obligations that citizens opt into by being part of a city or township and inherent obligation that cannot be opted out of. This second type of obligation was considered to be a moral duty inherent to all citizens. According to Kant, this moral duty presents all citizens to act in accordance with the way they would expect another reasonable citizen to act.


To summarize, both Locke and Kant believed that citizens possess obligations they can opt into as well as inherent moral obligations that must be followed regardless of membership to any political group. While Locke was more specific as to the nature of these obligations, focusing on the obligation of citizens to follow local rules and ordinances, Kant expanded upon this idea by discussing the general fundamental principles of human obligation, such as acting with goodwill towards other citizens.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...

Where did Atticus take the light and extension cord in To Kill a Mockingbird?

Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with... Atticus brings the light to the courthouse jail so that he can protect Tom Robinson.  Atticus learns that Tom Robinson, his client, is in danger.  A group of white men want to prevent the trial and lynch Robinson. He is warned by a small group of men that appear at his house.  He refuses to back down.  Atticus knows that the Cunninghams will target his client, so he plans to sit up all night with Jim if that’s what it takes to protect him.  Atticus tells the men that he will make sure his client gets his fair shake at the law.  “Link, that boy might go to the chair, but he’s not going till ...