Skip to main content

How would you analyze Macbeth's statement, "I am settled and bend up / Each corporal agent to this terrible feat" (1.7.92-93)?

This statement follows a difficult argument between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. Lady Macbeth becomes very angry with her husband when Macbeth says he does not want to move forward with their plan to kill Duncan (1.7.34). Lady Macbeth proceeds to try all manner of insults and manipulation to coerce Macbeth to recommit to their plan, including wounding his ego by insulting his masculinity and implying he is disloyal to her. She calls Macbeth a "coward"...

This statement follows a difficult argument between Macbeth and Lady Macbeth. Lady Macbeth becomes very angry with her husband when Macbeth says he does not want to move forward with their plan to kill Duncan (1.7.34). Lady Macbeth proceeds to try all manner of insults and manipulation to coerce Macbeth to recommit to their plan, including wounding his ego by insulting his masculinity and implying he is disloyal to her. She calls Macbeth a "coward" and claims he lacks courage. Lady Macbeth also says she would kill her own baby if she had promised him that she would do so. Once Lady Macbeth convinces Macbeth that no one will doubt their feigned grief when Duncan is discovered dead and that they can actually get away with this murder, Macbeth says, "I am settled and bend up / Each corporal agent to this terrible feat" (1.7.92-93). In other words, Lady Macbeth has convinced Macbeth to be in favor of their plan. After much indecision, Macbeth is no longer on the fence. He claims that all his actions will now be focused on murdering Duncan. Once Lady Macbeth has successfully convinced Macbeth, there is no going back; he will remain on this murderous path until the play's end.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more