Skip to main content

What is the difference between the role of women in 19th-century society and in Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen?

Really, there is not much difference at all between the role of upper-class women in the early nineteenth century and the way Austen writes them.  Austen has represented upper-class women as essentially having to make the choice between marrying whichever man happens to propose to them, no matter how stupid or inappropriate a match he might be, and running the risk that no one will ever ask her again and that she could end up...

Really, there is not much difference at all between the role of upper-class women in the early nineteenth century and the way Austen writes them.  Austen has represented upper-class women as essentially having to make the choice between marrying whichever man happens to propose to them, no matter how stupid or inappropriate a match he might be, and running the risk that no one will ever ask her again and that she could end up alone, a burden on her family. 


Charlotte Lucas, for example, feels that she has few options, and she is anxious -- at twenty-seven years old -- to secure "an establishment" for herself.  She doesn't want to be a burden on her family, and she's rapidly approaching old-maid status.  Therefore, when she gets a proposal from Elizabeth's cousin, the ridiculous Mr. Collins, who literally proposed to Elizabeth fewer than forty eight hours before, she accepts.  She figures she has as much a chance of being happy with him as she does if she remains unmarried, and at least she won't be an embarrassment to her brothers.  Likewise, many real-life women found themselves in a similar predicament.  Austen uses Pride and Prejudice to satirize, in part, the terrible choice that society forces on upper-class women of little fortune: marry whoever they can or risk social humiliation as an old maid.  This struggle was real.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...
Post a Comment
Read more

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...
Post a Comment
Read more