Skip to main content

What is the difference between the role of women in 19th-century society and in Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen?

Really, there is not much difference at all between the role of upper-class women in the early nineteenth century and the way Austen writes them.  Austen has represented upper-class women as essentially having to make the choice between marrying whichever man happens to propose to them, no matter how stupid or inappropriate a match he might be, and running the risk that no one will ever ask her again and that she could end up...

Really, there is not much difference at all between the role of upper-class women in the early nineteenth century and the way Austen writes them.  Austen has represented upper-class women as essentially having to make the choice between marrying whichever man happens to propose to them, no matter how stupid or inappropriate a match he might be, and running the risk that no one will ever ask her again and that she could end up alone, a burden on her family. 


Charlotte Lucas, for example, feels that she has few options, and she is anxious -- at twenty-seven years old -- to secure "an establishment" for herself.  She doesn't want to be a burden on her family, and she's rapidly approaching old-maid status.  Therefore, when she gets a proposal from Elizabeth's cousin, the ridiculous Mr. Collins, who literally proposed to Elizabeth fewer than forty eight hours before, she accepts.  She figures she has as much a chance of being happy with him as she does if she remains unmarried, and at least she won't be an embarrassment to her brothers.  Likewise, many real-life women found themselves in a similar predicament.  Austen uses Pride and Prejudice to satirize, in part, the terrible choice that society forces on upper-class women of little fortune: marry whoever they can or risk social humiliation as an old maid.  This struggle was real.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more