Skip to main content

What were the consequences of "Black Death"?

The Black Death was a terrible illness, the bubonic plague, that first struck Europe in the mid 1300s. It came about as a result of trade, travel, and ignorance. The plague is carried by a type of rat that lives near people in homes and in ships. Fleas that carry the actual bacterium lived on the rats and as the rats died, the fleas began feasting on human beings, giving them the disease. 

Over a short time, the plague traveled all across the Middle East and Europe, killing millions of people. Records kept during that period of time were sketchy, so various scholars have estimated different numbers of those actually killed. It was a large percentage of the population of the time.


Medicine at the time was a crude affair and the explanations of the time did not get anywhere close to what was really going on. As a result, attempts to prevent and treat the plague were worse than useless. 


As for consequences, since the population was decimated, this meant that there was a larger demand for labor, benefiting the laborers of the time, the peasants. This was not true for everyone; governments began restricting trade and some places, such as England who was at war with Scotland and needed grain imports, came close to starvation. 


There were social upheavals, as peasants became less restricted. The feudal system was partially decimated by the plague. Additionally, because of the lack of labor, people had to invent more efficient ways of doing things, such as agriculture. This lead to some technological innovations. 


Certain people were especially hurt by the plague's social consequences. Because there was no accurate explanation for the plague, people at the edge of society, such as the Jews, got blamed for it and were often killed. 


The plague would continue to strike Europe periodically for centuries after the initial strike in the 1300s. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

In Martel's Life of Pi, how does writing a diary help Pi Patel build on his leadership skills?

At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can... At the end of chapter 73, Pi first divulges the fact that he had started a diary after about a week alone at sea. Pi claims that he wrote about "practical stuff" (208) such as what he caught for food, foreseeable problems and solutions, Richard Parker, and reflections about specific events that occurred. In a sense, Pi is the captain of his ship; therefore, he must take responsibility for himself and his crew. He can do this by writing down events, problems and solutions, and reflections to look back on when confronted with repeated problems. It can ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why did Tybalt attack and kill Mercutio instead of Romeo, who he had originally been targeting?

Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio... Though Tybalt's quarrel is with Romeo, he begins the momentous duel in Act 3 by fighting with and killing Mercutio instead. Tybalt ultimately attacks Mercutio because the garrulous and hot-headed character insults Tybalt and goads him into a duel to protect Romeo's honor. From the beginning of the encounter in Act 3, Scene 1, it's clear that Mercutio is itching for a fight. For instance, when Tybalt signals that he wants to talk to Mercutio and Benvolio, Mercutio responds "And but one word with one of us?/ Couple it w...
Post a Comment
Read more