Skip to main content

How can I compare the culpability of the three witches, Macbeth, and Lady Macbeth in Duncan's murder?

The Three Weird Sisters may be considered culpable in Duncan’s death only by giving Macbeth the prophecy. However, they did not specify how Macbeth would be king. There are many possible paths for the fulfillment of this prophecy. It was Macbeth’s hubris to assume that he had to be active in his accession to the throne. In this way, the major guilt lies with Macbeth, not the witches. They simply spoke the truth as Fate...

The Three Weird Sisters may be considered culpable in Duncan’s death only by giving Macbeth the prophecy. However, they did not specify how Macbeth would be king. There are many possible paths for the fulfillment of this prophecy. It was Macbeth’s hubris to assume that he had to be active in his accession to the throne. In this way, the major guilt lies with Macbeth, not the witches. They simply spoke the truth as Fate would bring it about.


Initially, Macbeth, while he considers the possibility of murder, is not sure if he should do anything. It is his wife, Lady Macbeth, who pushes him over the edge. She accuses him of being weak in not taking a darker path to achieve his destiny. Left alone, he may have waited to see how Fate played out the prophecy.


Overall, it is Macbeth who is culpable of the death of Duncan and Banquo, as well as the others. Lady Macbeth is also culpable of “aiding and abetting” these murders. She herself killed the guards that Macbeth was too frightened to kill. Though strong as a warrior, Macbeth’s weakness and susceptibility to wrong influence led to his downfall.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more