Skip to main content

How does the electronegativity of elements depend on atomic size?

Electronegativity can be thought of as the ability of an atom to pull the bonding pair of electrons towards itself. The more electronegative an atom is, the closer the bonding pair will be to it. Metals generally have low electronegativity, while non-metals have higher values of electronegativity. When the electronegativity difference between the bonding atoms is high, we get an ionic bond. When the bonding atoms have similar electronegativity, we get a non-polar covalent bond.


...

Electronegativity can be thought of as the ability of an atom to pull the bonding pair of electrons towards itself. The more electronegative an atom is, the closer the bonding pair will be to it. Metals generally have low electronegativity, while non-metals have higher values of electronegativity. When the electronegativity difference between the bonding atoms is high, we get an ionic bond. When the bonding atoms have similar electronegativity, we get a non-polar covalent bond.


Electronegativity is dependent upon the size of the atom, since the attraction for electrons falls rapidly as the distance from the nucleus increases. The larger the atom gets, the more distant electrons become from the nucleus and hence have lesser attraction to the atom. That is why electronegativity decreases as we go down a group in the periodic table. This is because between each successive group member (as we go down), an extra electron shell is added to the atom and the bonding electrons become more distant from the nucleus. However, when we move across a period in the periodic table, electronegativity increases, since the atomic size decreases across a period.


Hope this helps.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more