Skip to main content

How would you analyze the poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" from a feminist and psychoanalytic perspective?

American-born British writer T.S. Eliot’s poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" was first published in 1915. This work is widely seen as heralding a cultural shift from Romanticism to Modernism.


The school of feminist criticism analyzes literature through the lens of feminist theory, exploring how literature responds to and reinforces aspects of our male-dominated society. Reading “Prufrock” from a feminist perspective, some critics have pointed to signs of misogyny. The refrain, “women come...

American-born British writer T.S. Eliot’s poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" was first published in 1915. This work is widely seen as heralding a cultural shift from Romanticism to Modernism.


The school of feminist criticism analyzes literature through the lens of feminist theory, exploring how literature responds to and reinforces aspects of our male-dominated society. Reading “Prufrock” from a feminist perspective, some critics have pointed to signs of misogyny. The refrain, “women come and go / Talking of Michelangelo,” reveals the speaker does not view women as individuals but as nameless “others,” who come and go, speaking of trivial matters. The reference to Michelangelo may also show the speaker’s insecurity, that he can never live up to the male ideal represented in Michelangelo’s art. The speaker also refers to women as disembodied parts: “Arms that are braceleted and white and bare,” “perfume from a dress,” “skirts that trail along the floor.” These details also point to the narrator’s view of women not as equal individuals but as mysterious, anxiety-inducing creatures. Similarly, the poem concludes with mermaid imagery, a symbol of alien and even dangerous female sexuality.


Psychoanalytic literary criticism is influenced by the theories of Sigmund Freud and posits that literature may reveal unconscious desires or anxieties of the author. “Prufrock” lends itself to psychoanalytic criticism because of its dream-like, stream-of-consciousness style. Viewed from this lens, the speaker of the poem reveals anxieties about himself and sexuality. The speaker brings up “an overwhelming question” that he is too afraid to ask. He refers to “the eyes” that he feels must be judging him. He imagines his failure to connect emotionally and a woman’s disappointment with the repeated words, “That is not what I meant at all; That is not it, at all.” The speaker frets about his physical shortcomings—getting older, losing his hair, being too thin.


The feminist and psychoanalytic schools of criticism do not compete but complement each other in interpreting this poem. The speaker reveals himself to be a man preoccupied with himself, seeking emotional connection with a woman, but too fearful to truly connect.


See links below for more analysis of the poem and to hear a recording of T.S. Eliot reading the poem.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more