Skip to main content

"In Eye and Mind," Merleau-Ponty is trying to evoke for us the experience of the painter. What is that experience and how is it supposed to change...

Merleau-Ponty focuses on embodiment, or how our bodies live and move and have being in the world. In "Eye and Mind," he looks at painters as embodied beings. Unlike scientists, who he understands as observing the world as if they are not a part of it, viewing it as an object "out there" to be studied, the painter necessarily immerses himself "in" the world. The painter's ways of seeing and moving become part of what he...

Merleau-Ponty focuses on embodiment, or how our bodies live and move and have being in the world. In "Eye and Mind," he looks at painters as embodied beings. Unlike scientists, who he understands as observing the world as if they are not a part of it, viewing it as an object "out there" to be studied, the painter necessarily immerses himself "in" the world. The painter's ways of seeing and moving become part of what he is painting. The painter sees, says Merleau-Ponty, with eyes that view the world, but these eyes also view himself, the painter, in the world. He paints with hands that are physically part of the world. His way of seeing is thus fundamentally different from the scientist's and more congruent with the reality of how humans actually interact with the world, for our bodies make us interconnected with the physical spaces we are observing. A painting is transformative because it reveals not just the detached object that the painter has rendered but a vision of the artist's consciousness in interaction with the world. This is more authentic than trying to observe as if we are standing outside of real space and time. As Merleau-Ponty writes,



I do not see [space] according to its exterior envelope; I live in it from the inside; I am immersed in it. After all, the world is all around me, not in front of me . . .



He also writes that, "It is by lending his body to the world that the painter changes the world into paintings."


This way of seeing is transformational, which I believe is what is meant by leading to a "new cultural regime," because it erases the boundaries between self and other and emphasizes that humans are part of, not separate from, the rest of the world. We are no longer looking "at" things but "with" a thing, or "according to it," as Merleau-Ponty puts it. There is no objective place we can stand outside of other things. This may seem more commonplace to us now in the post-modern world than it did in 1964, when the essay was written, but we can also safely posit that much of how humans view the world is still in terms of looking "at" it for purposes of control and domination rather than "with" it for purposes of understanding our interconnectedness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...