Skip to main content

Who dies as a result of Macbeth's latest decree? Why are these murders more horrific than the previous one?

After Macbeth murders Duncan, he experiences a great deal of guilt, and he worries quite a bit about the consequences of his action. Once he has become king, however, he realizes that he is still not happy because he doesn't feel secure in his position: the Weird Sisters promised that Banquo's issue would be kings. Macbeth says, "To be thus is nothing / But to be safely thus" (3.1.52-53). In order to be "safely thus,"...

After Macbeth murders Duncan, he experiences a great deal of guilt, and he worries quite a bit about the consequences of his action. Once he has become king, however, he realizes that he is still not happy because he doesn't feel secure in his position: the Weird Sisters promised that Banquo's issue would be kings. Macbeth says, "To be thus is nothing / But to be safely thus" (3.1.52-53). In order to be "safely thus," he orders the murders of Banquo and his son Fleance. This is more horrific than Duncan's murder (which takes place off-stage) because it involves the attempted murder of a child and because it happens on stage, in full view of the audience. To watch a murder on stage is far more horrifying than it is to only hear about a character committing a murder.


Furthermore, when Macbeth learns that Macduff has fled Scotland and is out of his reach, he determines to kill his family: Macduff's wife, children, and even his servants. These are the most horrifying murders of the play because they happen on stage, they include the murder of an innocent mother and her babes, and because Macbeth has absolutely nothing to gain by it. He killed Duncan to get the crown; he ordered Banquo's murder to try to secure his position; however, there is no real reason for Macbeth to kill Macduff's family other than to be cruel and display his power.

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...