Skip to main content

In Act II, what are seven clear signs given that Romeo and Juliet takes place in the 1500s?






Expert Answers








  1. Juliet is a young teenager (her father says she is not yet 14). In Act II, scene 1, we see her planning to marry the guy she likes, and not in the distant future. Juliet wants it to happen tomorrow! Those are definitely not 21st century plans. 

  2. Also in scene 1, Juliet is afraid of what will happen to Romeo should the Capulet guards find him. The practice of wealthy people hiring guards to patrol their grounds has all but died out today. 

  3. When Romeo goes to see Friar Lawrence in scene 2, the Friar is mixing up medicines. This was a part of most holy men's jobs back in the 1500s, when going to the doctor was way too expensive for many. Today, medical care may not be cheap, but it is far more accessible for the general public.

  4. Friar Laurence agreeing to marry two teenagers without their parent's permission, while unpopular in the play's time period, would actually be illegal now. 

  5. Tybalt's language when he mocks Romeo and Mercutio in the streets in scene 3 is also a clue as to the play's setting. Most modern-day feuds don't involve bragging about one's sword-fighting skills or challenging each other to duels.

  6. In scene 3, people make several jokes about Romeo being effeminate. This goes back to the Elizabethan idea that being in love with a woman made men more womanly and effeminate, which is not really believed today.

  7. This seems obvious, but the language the characters use (early modern English) shows the time period of the play. On a related note, the many references to well-known characters from antiquity (such as Mercutio comparing Rosaline to Laura and Helen of Troy and Cleopatra in scene 3) show the collective unconscious of that time. 







Further Reading:











Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more