Skip to main content

Macbeth is reported to be a valiant soldier in Act I. The line "Till he unseamed him from the nave to th’chops / And fixed his head upon our...

As your question states, the first time we hear about Macbeth, he is praised as an impressive soldier. When the wounded Captain relates the story of Macbeth's slaying of the rebel Macdonwald, he refers to "brave Macbeth—well he deserves that name" (I.ii.16). King Duncan praises Macbeth as "valiant cousin" and "worthy gentleman" (I.ii.24). However, your question seems to imply that Macbeth's actions don't deserve that descriptor. In fact, given how Macbeth bests Macdonwald (as stated in the...

As your question states, the first time we hear about Macbeth, he is praised as an impressive soldier. When the wounded Captain relates the story of Macbeth's slaying of the rebel Macdonwald, he refers to "brave Macbeth—well he deserves that name" (I.ii.16). King Duncan praises Macbeth as "valiant cousin" and "worthy gentleman" (I.ii.24). However, your question seems to imply that Macbeth's actions don't deserve that descriptor. In fact, given how Macbeth bests Macdonwald (as stated in the lines you quote in your question, from I.ii.22-3), we might be more tempted to call him "barbaric" rather than "valiant."


First of all, remember that "valiant" means "possessing bravery" or doing acts marked by "courage or determination" (Merriam-Webster dictionary). The sheer fact that Macbeth was able to face a commander of the rebel army and best him so handily is, in the context of battle, worthy of being called "valiant."


Secondly, we must consider the time period and circumstances in which Shakespeare's characters (and, really, Shakespeare himself) lived. The historical Macbeth whose life inspired Shakespeare's play ruled in Scotland from 1040–1057. These were the "dark ages," when daily life itself was rough and brutal—and war was even more so.


"Unseaming" your opponent in the violence of hand-to-hand combat was not uncommon. The practice of beheading the commander of an enemy's army goes back to Biblical times (for just one example, see David cutting off Goliath's head); the placing of the head on a pike or battlement was a way to ensure that everyone on both sides saw that the enemy had been bested. Sometimes, even in Shakespeare's day, traitors' heads were placed where people could see them as a way to quell similarly rebellious impulses.


So, given the times and circumstance, as well as the mindset of Macbeth and his contemporaries (and Shakespeare's audience), the actions Macbeth takes on the battlefield are not only commonplace, but deserving (in their minds) of being called "valiant."

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is the meaning of "juggling fiends" in Macbeth?

Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a... Macbeth is beginning to realize that the three witches have been deceiving him since he first encountered them. Like jugglers, they have kept changing their forecasts in order create confusion. This is particularly apparent when the Second Apparition they raise in Act IV,   Scene 1 tells him that no man of woman born can overcome him in hand-to-hand battle--and then Macbeth finds himself confronted by the one man he has been avoiding out of a sense of guilt, and that man tells him: Despair thy charm. And let the angel whom thou still hast serve...
Post a Comment
Read more

What are some external and internal conflicts that Montag has in Fahrenheit 451?

 Montag, the protagonist of Fahrenheit 451, faces both external and internal conflicts throughout the novel. Some examples of these conflicts are: External Conflicts: Conflict with the society: Montag lives in a society that prohibits books and critical thinking. He faces opposition from the government and the people who enforce this law. Montag struggles to come to terms with the fact that his society is based on censorship and control. Conflict with his wife: Montag's wife, Mildred, is completely absorbed in the shallow and meaningless entertainment provided by the government. Montag's growing dissatisfaction with his marriage adds to his external conflict. Conflict with the fire captain: Montag's superior, Captain Beatty, is the personification of the oppressive regime that Montag is fighting against. Montag's struggle against Beatty represents his external conflict with the government. Internal Conflicts: Conflict with his own beliefs: Montag, at the beginning of th...
Post a Comment
Read more

In A People's History of the United States, why does Howard Zinn feel that Wilson made a flimsy argument for entering World War I?

"War is the health of the state," the radical writer Randolph Bourne said, in the midst of the First World War. Indeed, as the nations of Europe went to war in 1914, the governments flourished, patriotism bloomed, class struggle was stilled, and young men died in frightful numbers on the battlefields-often for a hundred yards of land, a line of trenches. -- Chapter 14, Page 350, A People's History of the United States Howard Zinn outlines his arguments for why World War I was fought in the opening paragraph of Chapter 14 (referenced above). The nationalism that was created by the Great War benefited the elite political and financial leadership of the various countries involved. Socialism, which was gaining momentum in Europe, as was class struggle, took a backseat to mobilizing for war. Zinn believes that World War I was fought for the gain of the industrial capitalists of Europe in a competition for capital and resources. He states that humanity itself was punished by t...
Post a Comment
Read more