Skip to main content

In Shakespeare's Macbeth, how is Macbeth's ambition his hamartia?

As a reminder, hamartia refers to a character's tragic flaw. Macbeth's ambition is his hamartia because it is responsible for his downfall and death in the final scene of the play. 


Consider, for instance, that Macbeth's ambition drives him to embark on his bloody quest for the throne, an enterprise that begins with killing King Duncan and progresses with further, ruthless murders. Macbeth's ambitious, bloody thirst for power turns him into a tyrant and forces...

As a reminder, hamartia refers to a character's tragic flaw. Macbeth's ambition is his hamartia because it is responsible for his downfall and death in the final scene of the play. 


Consider, for instance, that Macbeth's ambition drives him to embark on his bloody quest for the throne, an enterprise that begins with killing King Duncan and progresses with further, ruthless murders. Macbeth's ambitious, bloody thirst for power turns him into a tyrant and forces his former allies to turn against him and, in the end, to destroy him.


It's interesting to note that the witches' prophesy doesn't actually say anything about killing King Duncan. The witches famously predict that Macbeth will become king, but they don't specify how; Macbeth is the one who chooses to murder his way to the top. Though there's no way to know for sure, it's possible that, had Macbeth chosen to wait and do nothing, King Duncan would have died of natural causes. Furthermore, it's not preposterous to imagine a scenario in which Duncan's sons were unable to assume the throne. Since Macbeth was a favorite of Duncan's, it's also not unreasonable to assume that Macbeth could have been crowned king in the absence of Duncan and his sons, thus peacefully fulfilling the prophesy. As such, Macbeth's bloody conquests can be seen as a product of his own ambition, which in turn proves this quality to be his tragic flaw.  

Popular posts from this blog

In chapter one of The Great Gatsby, what advice does Nick's father give him? How does this make him a good person to tell this story?

Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches... Nick says that his father advised him that, before "criticizing anyone," he "remember that all the people in this world haven't had the same advantages" as Nick.  As a result, Nick claims that he is "inclined to reserve all judgments," presenting himself to the reader as a fair and dispassionate arbiter of character, and thus, a reliable narrator.   The problem is that Nick immediately reveals himself as anything but reliable, as he then launches into a discussion of how pe...

How and why does James Gatz become Jay Gatsby? Describe the young Gatsby/Gatz.

James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune,... James Gatz, a poor Midwestern boy of probable Jewish lineage, becomes Jay Gatsby, a presumed WASP and wealthy socialite, when he moves to New York City and acquires his fortune. It is wealth that has allowed Gatz to transform himself into Gatsby. However, those who know his background (e.g., Daisy and Tom Buchanan) never allow him to forget that he is nouveau riche -- that is, an upstart who has just recently made his fortune, whereas they arose from well-to-do families. Gatz became Gatsby through determination and discipline. At the end of the novel, the narr...

Explain and discuss how the definitions of freedom change for the nation, for the freedmen and for southern whites after the Civil War.

After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to... After the Civil War, the definition of freedom changed in the nation, as slavery was ended with the 13th Amendment to the Constitution in 1865. The practice of slavery was disallowed, but definition of the freedom that would take its place was a subject of controversy, ongoing debate, and even violence in the decades to come.  For freedmen, freedom often meant reconciling with their families, who were broken up by slavery; choosing which church to belong to without being ordered to attend religious services (or not to attend) by their mast...